Scott Classical (Page 2)

Really beautiful simple brills.
Affordable defensively!

Model year: 2001

It's a good pair of glasses for beginners and semi-glasses. affordable and perfect in Swedish mountains ... you can not ask for a couple of super glasses for 300riksdaler, which they are not ... clear + for the price, something - for desinge ....

Model year: 2000

Strengths:
- Extremely affordable.
- Sits like a cast on the face.
- Seats like a helmet.
- Cheap with new lenses.
- High coolness factor. (Those who think that the more expensive, the cooler, will be happy to discuss that with me.)

Weaknesses:
"With such a basic bow / frame you should be able to deliver in a few more colors and designs.

Summary:
Actually the world's best ski glasses! Immar as often as any pair of goggles in the 1000kr class. Who can have a product like Fredrik Nyberg been faithful all year? :-) Will never get out of fashion.

Model year: 1998

Not the best just but efficient. Costs almost free

Model year: 2001

actually good! classic o cheap! me mirror glass and those fatcoola! are being immature, but immune disappears quickly. Works perfectly on both the helmet and the hat additionally!

Model year: 2000

I think they are not good at all, they break after a season !! o man looks almost nothing in them! very badly done

Model year: 2000

They were perfect!
They'll be the best with just a hat.
The 300: - men's peyar is paid back in the piste.
In the beginning, they may be immature but still a pair of nice glasses.

Model year: 1998