Nordica Fire Arrow F2
Model year: 2013
Sizes: 24,0-31,0
What do you think about Nordica Fire Arrow F2?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
Extremely comfortable, while providing excellent contact with the ski. The 45-degree buckle makes the heel grip perfect
Weaknesses:
The design is a bit impatient.
Summary:
A very competent and comfortable piece.
Model year: 2016
Extremely comfortable, while providing excellent contact with the ski. The 45-degree buckle makes the heel grip perfect
Weaknesses:
The design is a bit impatient.
Summary:
A very competent and comfortable piece.
Model year: 2016
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Strengths:
+ Fit: Sitting beautifully on the foot, hugging in a good way and really soft, nice inner shoe (certainly, too, has to do with the way my feet look)
+ Usability: I've been walking hard pistons, waistcoats and everything in between. Sure, maybe there are no park pants, but otherwise they work most of the time.
+ Innersko: Really high performance. I did not bake mine, but went in the usual way. Shaped very well after the foot. In addition, it is warm and comfortable.
+ Partial rubber sole: Always nice with a firm fit under the paws, regardless of when hiking or after skiing.
+ Progressive flex: "The harder the more aggressive you go" claims both Nordica and the seller. And actually, it works. Perhaps not an incredible difference, but have never felt that the pants are feeling too soft. Or too hard.
Weaknesses:
- Adjustable flex: Is skeptical of the adjustable flex. Obviously, no difference between the two flexes (Up to 125 in hard mode, up to 115 in soft mode).
-Super to come in: The slippers (according to Nordica) should be easy to get in is bullshit. Having big problems with getting your feet down when the skull is cold.
Price: Is relatively expensive. I gave 4400: - (December 2012). Price: 4800: -.
Summary:
Overall, a canon jacket that works perfectly for those who want a performance pants that are relatively tight in flex. Even more perfect if you travel across the mountain, with varying snow, feels like they work most of the time. Sitting, despite the performance, is very nice at the foot and I have never had a problem with the fit. Generously read on 100mm.
+ Fit: Sitting beautifully on the foot, hugging in a good way and really soft, nice inner shoe (certainly, too, has to do with the way my feet look)
+ Usability: I've been walking hard pistons, waistcoats and everything in between. Sure, maybe there are no park pants, but otherwise they work most of the time.
+ Innersko: Really high performance. I did not bake mine, but went in the usual way. Shaped very well after the foot. In addition, it is warm and comfortable.
+ Partial rubber sole: Always nice with a firm fit under the paws, regardless of when hiking or after skiing.
+ Progressive flex: "The harder the more aggressive you go" claims both Nordica and the seller. And actually, it works. Perhaps not an incredible difference, but have never felt that the pants are feeling too soft. Or too hard.
Weaknesses:
- Adjustable flex: Is skeptical of the adjustable flex. Obviously, no difference between the two flexes (Up to 125 in hard mode, up to 115 in soft mode).
-Super to come in: The slippers (according to Nordica) should be easy to get in is bullshit. Having big problems with getting your feet down when the skull is cold.
Price: Is relatively expensive. I gave 4400: - (December 2012). Price: 4800: -.
Summary:
Overall, a canon jacket that works perfectly for those who want a performance pants that are relatively tight in flex. Even more perfect if you travel across the mountain, with varying snow, feels like they work most of the time. Sitting, despite the performance, is very nice at the foot and I have never had a problem with the fit. Generously read on 100mm.
Translated by Google ・ Show original