Tecnica Cochise 130 PRO

Tecnica Cochise 130 PRO
Brand: Tecnica
Model year: 2014
Flex: 130
Sizes: 220-310

What do you think about Tecnica Cochise 130 PRO?
5
4
3
2
1
4.8
4 reviews
gustafrm
01/12/2017
Strengths:
Fit and versatility, like the sole can be switched to tech te.x. The flex in the pants feels good with good resistance throughout and does not feel saggy.

Weaknesses:
The walking mode has more to be desired compared to a clean go-to boot.

Summary:
In summary, a good pants that I have spent many weeks with.

Model year: 2013
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
LP_Larsson
06/02/2017
Strengths:
Best shoe I had, easy to wear, fit well. warm, works as well with hides as on rack pockets
Lighter than many other shoes.

Weaknesses:
Should have been the gross sun on default.

Summary:
Cannon trap, if it fits the foot

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
streimert
14/01/2013
Strengths:
Stiff, good fit for my feet with a huge heel for me. Good gauge (maybe not like my Titan UL) and good grip in the sole (bought for AT soles with rubber then everything else goes away for me). Took me 2 days to find out how I would get the upper buckle and booster the strap so I would get even pressure across the plow ,,,

Weaknesses:
Weighs about 2.1kg ,,,, but is down priority and not up ....
Not to include the soles without buying

Summary:
The best pants I went with ... Have headed with Head S8, Garmont Radium, Garmont Adrenaline and Dynafit Titan UL.
Then it's up with pants that it's very subjective..some some and not others.
The pants are a clean quality building according to my amateur eyes ,,, but with reference to the above pants (note that UL is also a very nice pants but a whole different segment).
A little strange to NOT that the soles are included, but you have to pay a further $ 500 to go normally without killing :)
I then went with them in Vemdalen (with Dynastar Sultan 85) to go inside them before I go to La Grave (with Sidestash) for 2 weeks. I will return when I had the further 2 weeks in varied backgrounds.
By the way, I weigh about 85kg and is 183cm tall and have the skis then 184cm Sultan ,, and 188 for the side stash ,,,

Model year: 2013
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
streimert
14/01/2013
Strengths:
After getting used to these now for a week in the vemdalen in piste with a pair of Dynastar Sultan 85, I have most positive things. It's a straight pants that answer right when you press the plunge. There is a progressive flex that took a couple of days to understand and then how I would put the top buckle and booster the strap so I had even pressure over the entire thigh. I also see that it is a quality building compared to my early Garmont Radium or Adrenaline. The heel grip on this shoe fits my heel perfectly. The ease of setting the boosterstrap is absolutely huge. Incredible that no more have taken this brilijanta solution.

Weaknesses:
That one has to buy AT soles that are not included in the purchase. Something heavy about ,, 2.1kg ,,,,

Summary:
A pants that I am so far very pleased with, one-way stable and stiff. As soon as I found the buckles correctly, the cannon and the flair were right even at puckles and irregularities. I am looking forward to excitement, because I will shortly have 2 weeks in La Grave in various relationships with a couple of Sidestashis. Normally, I have a pair of Dynafit Titan UL, which is a cannon beautiful and light ,,, but slightly soft down and that you have to tighten them tight enough to get stiffness. JAg weighs 86kg and here 183cm tall. The Sultan 184cm and Sidestashis are 188com ... Returns when I had 2 weeks in La Grave ...

Model year: 2013
Translated by Google  ・  Show original