4FRNT CRJ

4FRNT CRJ
Category: Park & Pipe
Level: Advanced
Brand: 4FRNT
Model year: 2014
Measure (Tip/Waist/Tail): 120/109/117 mm Turning radius: 25.00 m Weight: 1820 gram (164 cm)
Lengths: 164,172,180,188 cm

What do you think about 4FRNT CRJ?
5
4
3
2
1
4.5
2 reviews
Jonny Dauncey
Jonny Dauncey (Guest)
06/05/2010
Strengths:
I own a massively bad boy pair of 175 crj's (RIP) which are amazingly good off busy slopes. Took them for a spin off the back of VT after a massive dump (of snow....!) and they surpassed all my expectations. From a heavy, hard to manage piste ski and un-rideable in the park they transform any powder into a floating paradise; deathly drop offs become a casual affair, massive powder carves feel recklessly satisfying and they reish a notch up in speed. A true master piece for any skier i the realms of expert.

Weaknesses:
They struggle massively with groomed snow and feel heavy in the park.

Summary:
BUY SOME! Even if u can't ski, they're a work of art........ROOOOOOAR!!!!!

Model year: 2010
Riding style: Powder
Riders weight: 68 kg
Riders length: 175 cm

PNyberg
31/03/2010 (Modified: 05/03/2015)
Strengths:
Time too little evaluation.
Have now used these about 30 days and start looking more nuanced what I like and do not like with the ski.

The forces are actually more than you think when you first know these skis.
The flex is terribly playful so butters are fully possible. The radius is ok, could have seen it a few meters shorter (reaches 188 and then it's 28m) but it's not a good idea to worry more than a slower pace.
Extremely balanced ski! Feels more like a park ski in the air than an allmountain pudder ski. If you are jibber, which I am not, then you will enjoy these!

Weaknesses:
Yes, I think the flex is a little clumsy, for example, if you want to drive on bad surfaces, they would like to be more in the air than they are on the snow. Far from being unable to go with them but you get tired of your legs than compared to driving the same terrain with an EHP193 ... duuh
So, would have liked to see that it was stiffer under the foot. Would definitely not change the flex on the other side as it would get a bit too rigid and then flow worse in the powpow.
The flood of powpow is, of course, one thing I'm not impressed with of a ski that is still 118mm below the foot. Because it's very early loses and the tip is very narrow, it has dive trends. Not often, but when it happens, you may go over the board.
The flex also makes the stump a lot harder when you have to land at the bottom of the foot otherwise it will easily become a wheelie.

Summary:
Easy and playful skiing that likes everything on the whole mountain and you are welcome to go downstairs. Good in pillows but not direct superflight because the tippers are too narrow and the mounting point may be too far ahead.

Model year: 2010
Riding style: pillows, pistons, offpist
Length on the ski: 188 cm
Riders weight: 80 kg
Riders length: 187 cm

Translated by Google  ・  Show original