Atomic 10.EX
Brand: AtomicModel year: 2002
What do you think about Atomic 10.EX?
5
4
3
2
1

Strengths:
An all-time great in my opinion! Very popular in its days!
Weaknesses:
Not the latest and greatest but much better than the old-fashioned skis that used basic materials in skis!
Summary:
All around mountain ski that offers a fun all around experience!
Riding style: All Mountain but not a powder ski
Length on the ski: 180 cm
An all-time great in my opinion! Very popular in its days!
Weaknesses:
Not the latest and greatest but much better than the old-fashioned skis that used basic materials in skis!
Summary:
All around mountain ski that offers a fun all around experience!
Riding style: All Mountain but not a powder ski
Length on the ski: 180 cm
I have a pair of diamond freeride bindings on and drive it as a ride skid. Gold for the most part, but it gets really steep, makes the slope of the skirt that it gets a little hard to get in the whole edge and I feel like a bit uncomfortable. It may be my turquoise as haunted as well. Cruel in piste, tonight with a turn in the skid when you gained some speed. Maybe a bit fluttery in when you want to get out of the little extra but you can take it.
Riders weight: 85 kg
Riders weight: 85 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original

Have driven with the ski in the home team for a short week and I think they are fun! Perfect to carry on with big cutting turns! Works well in the offpiste and cruel in the maneuver despite the waist size. This is due primarily to the fact that it is an all-purpose ski run built from a racing ski, and it really feels as speed begins to increase and increase and increase .....! But when you hit a big blue spot, it actually gives way, because it does not work really well. Can be added that it's not very easy to drive short-range with it, but who's the fan of short-range travel nowadays?!?
Riders weight: 69 kg
Riders weight: 69 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
This skiing works most of the time, just want a ski that will handle everything is 10 ex you should have, It's better than G4, because it's a bit softer at the top but equally fast-paced, that's a bit more forgiving in snowy snow. 191 cm has dimensions 117-84-109 and 24.5 m radius.
Model year: 2001
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Went with them in a season in Austria. Also drove the G41 which is a very good ski. No difference really. TENEX is a little harder in a hard puck.
If you do not drive the iron in the piste, it's the skis that drive with you. Nothing for dense leg muscles.
If you spend a lot of time jumping, TENEX is nothing to hang in spruce. Instead, have a couple of trick ski (I have 1080) which is a very fun ski.
But for its purpose, TENEX is absolutely superb!
Model year: 2001
If you do not drive the iron in the piste, it's the skis that drive with you. Nothing for dense leg muscles.
If you spend a lot of time jumping, TENEX is nothing to hang in spruce. Instead, have a couple of trick ski (I have 1080) which is a very fun ski.
But for its purpose, TENEX is absolutely superb!
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
NOTE! The dimensions are incorrect, they are 83mm wide in the middle NOT 64! That's what it said!
I bought my TENEX at the end of February downstairs in Anton and then have a record with it daily until now this weekend when I got away from my season there!
This is one of the best all-rocks available if you are a person who is looking forward to shooting off piste ak and not the most aker backe. It works the cannon in all pistons and it also works well outside.
I'm really pleased.
However, I'll raise a little warning's finger, because if you're looking for a ski to just go offpiste by taking the days when it's snowy and sunny weather and the pillows are waiting to be scared :) then it's not TENEX to buy without having to invest in something that is a bit softer. These tend to feel a bit fragile in the pillows. This is what you're welcome soon and do not think so badly!
So this is a ski that is highly recommended! :)
Model year: 2001
I bought my TENEX at the end of February downstairs in Anton and then have a record with it daily until now this weekend when I got away from my season there!
This is one of the best all-rocks available if you are a person who is looking forward to shooting off piste ak and not the most aker backe. It works the cannon in all pistons and it also works well outside.
I'm really pleased.
However, I'll raise a little warning's finger, because if you're looking for a ski to just go offpiste by taking the days when it's snowy and sunny weather and the pillows are waiting to be scared :) then it's not TENEX to buy without having to invest in something that is a bit softer. These tend to feel a bit fragile in the pillows. This is what you're welcome soon and do not think so badly!
So this is a ski that is highly recommended! :)
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original

For example, a super ski! The best I tried! Great in pillows, wet-sneezing and in spring snow. I drive at 1.93, I myself am a lightweight of about 75kg driving powerfully. If you like fast big turns in varying terrain, Ten ex is super! It works surprisingly well in pist as long as you do not want to drive short-range but enjoy sailing with big turns. Stable without being too soft or too hard and giving a quick response when pressed.
Model year: 2001
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Ski Ski !! The superlatives from my side are great when it comes to this particular model. A wide ski that works the whole season without making a rider disappointed. It bites well in blue and works perfectly on large unspoilt slopes. Jump and play should be done great and it's okay to go to any park is not applicable to this ski.
Should you be as close to H.Maier as you can, this is the ski you will acquire with one-time.
This year's model is not the one that fits me best on the lip as they make the skid wider and therefore the cut has become a pain, but it still works well all the way. Of course, I prefer the last year's model, which is clearly more racing graphics than the more free-kicked variant of the year, but you do not buy the slide for its appearance without its performance. The shadow is also clearly suited to make top trips, because it is for the time being easy to compare with other wider skis.
Model year: 2001
Should you be as close to H.Maier as you can, this is the ski you will acquire with one-time.
This year's model is not the one that fits me best on the lip as they make the skid wider and therefore the cut has become a pain, but it still works well all the way. Of course, I prefer the last year's model, which is clearly more racing graphics than the more free-kicked variant of the year, but you do not buy the slide for its appearance without its performance. The shadow is also clearly suited to make top trips, because it is for the time being easy to compare with other wider skis.
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Have spent a half season on these, 183 cm. The first yard became an ice-cold, hard backing. But it went well in addition to the first ride. Lightweight stable skis in all bowls, nice for what the Swedish mountains offer. Excellent in a sneeze, quite ok in the usual piste. Among the cheapest fetuses, but absolutely among the best.
Model year: 2001
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
