Atomic Beta Race 9.12

Brand: Atomic
Model year: 2002

What do you think about Atomic Beta Race 9.12?
5
4
3
2
1
4.7
3 reviews
raa
13/08/2004
Has this skis in 160cm with swing radius 11m. Having a problem with blueberry, which is due to lack of leg strength (terribly sharp steel edges with an alloy that rusts immediately if they are not wiped off soon after use). From hard to slumber, the skis have an incredible swing, which really takes on the thigh muscles. Some of the funniest I have owned by skiing, and with an incredible thrill. Withstand only medium speed. With my lack of leg strength I should have 150cm. Recommend to select these short, as well as not the only ski see the first post.

Riders weight: 70 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Herman_Mustonen
22/04/2002
Tested this ski in the length of 170cm. If you buy the ski for what it is made for, you should go down in length to at least 160cm. Very fun skiing with a lot of turn in. Overwhelming stable at high speed through the dirt pads (not directly like G4 but clearly approved). Works well well in the humpback. Begin to understand that this ski was selected for the "Ski of the Year" -2002 in the United States. Would work well as a complement to a few fetches ex. Head Monster.

Model year: 2001
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Jonas_e
22/04/2002
Atomic Beta Race 9.12 170cm What to say-It turns! The skiing curves something incredible. If you do not get the layer in the blue, there is no material error but in the thigh muscles the problem should be sought. I've driven the skid on everything from ice to deep loose snow to slash, it's the best way to do it in the piste. However, one should be aware that in high speed it requires a lot of bone strength not to leave its owner. Ergo; a lively speedboat with cannonball and short-range possibilities.

Model year: 2001
Translated by Google  ・  Show original