Atomic Beta Ride 10.EX

Nothing for weak legs. You must drive stone hard with them all the time.
You burn the piste and surf the powder. However, it is heavy to jump with.

Model year: 2001

Realize that maybe I should write something if these layers then I actually wanted to get them tested a couple under a whole square. in Lognan / Argentier.

Had not snowed for a while, the skis were only allowed to sneak snow and tough piste.
Even a pretty tired body that left them.

Can only say I went MUCH more fun skis than these. They are TOTALLY characterless.

Should you have a pair of Atomic buy their race skis. They are good at them. You can not live with that. Not if you are honest with yourself.

/ T Style

Model year: 2001

Fought Atomic's fathom in half-conditions in Squaw Valley. The test is not quite representative because there were not so many pillows to drive in, but difficult to vary before offpiste and soft steep puckle. The ski was freshly repaired with too sharp edges, which I almost destroyed the rods in an attempt to demolish them. I do not know what Atomic has for steel at the edges but were not the soft racing edges anyway, they seemed completely unbreakable. Rid 191 cm in length and a bit longer would probably have been good. Anyway, how was this ski now?

Such, it is light and hard but feels quite lifeless. I like skiing with that hard-defined pressure and it does not have this ski. In the humpback, the back ends fast, as Betan has one of the widest ends of all fetches. The skis are twisted so on ice you should probably have quite high "lifters" which the demo slide did not have either. Summed up, the test was not quite fair for the ski but I think it gave enough to say that there are better skis with the same character, XXX and G41 eg

Model year: 2001