Atomic C:11.16
Model year: 2003
What do you think about Atomic C:11.16?
5
4
3
2
1
Really good skiing! Works well both in the piste but also as a good allround ski. Pretty stiff behind, so the piste properties get really sharp. Do not have the dimensions and the softness to work where there are bottomless cushions, but do not really get lost in the Swedish mountains. The 11 Series is a bit stiffer in the flex than the 9 Series. If I'm to be honest, it's not the biggest difference if you do not go to the Beta Race series.
A little disappointed with the design, does not feel like a ski costing 6000 bananas.
Plus for already mounted plate, sorry for Atomic's own bindings weighing lead pork only ...
Do you only have a couple of layers one that's perfect.
// Danne
Model year: 2002
A little disappointed with the design, does not feel like a ski costing 6000 bananas.
Plus for already mounted plate, sorry for Atomic's own bindings weighing lead pork only ...
Do you only have a couple of layers one that's perfect.
// Danne
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original