Atomic Metron M:10 Puls-ti
Model year: 2005
What do you think about Atomic Metron M:10 Puls-ti?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
Perfect allround skiing!
Weaknesses:
Slightly windy in high pistes in the piste. I just drove my rifles, burst below, the steel edge had dropped! A little bad after about 10 ski days!
Summary:
Cannon Ski! Hope I got hold of a couple of Monday ex. Otherwise, I have to say that the durability is completely safe !!!
Riding style: Mostly, but not park.
Length on the ski: 178 cm
Riders weight: 78 kg
Riders length: 183 cm
Perfect allround skiing!
Weaknesses:
Slightly windy in high pistes in the piste. I just drove my rifles, burst below, the steel edge had dropped! A little bad after about 10 ski days!
Summary:
Cannon Ski! Hope I got hold of a couple of Monday ex. Otherwise, I have to say that the durability is completely safe !!!
Riding style: Mostly, but not park.
Length on the ski: 178 cm
Riders weight: 78 kg
Riders length: 183 cm
Translated by Google ・ Show original
This ski is extremely nice, it works extremely well both in the piste and offpiste.
It is the most complete all-round ski. It's really really well done.
Riders weight: 75 kg
It is the most complete all-round ski. It's really really well done.
Riders weight: 75 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Perhaps the ultimate allmountain ski run?
I now have 10 days on two different pairs of M10, a pair of 171 cm and a pair of 164 cm. I weight 73kg myself and find that 171cm is too stiff for me, the weight is not enough to get a good edge on ice. 164 cm, however, is quite suitable for the vast majority of conditions, since it is a rigid and heavy skid with good stability. However, the short length means that the balance can be a problem. It is important not to get too far behind, without standing in the middle of the ski all the time.
Now I have mostly gone on racing and skating skis and do not have so much experience of clean offpiste skiing, so my impressions are based on this. I've driven the ski in a lot of different conditions, about 60% offpiste of varying kinds and 40% piste. Here I think it behaves in these different circumstances:
Pillows: The width makes it flow well. Perhaps a bit of a cut for really high traffic, but another cannon ski.
Croped offpist: Here is the best. You can drive the way you want and it just plows through everything.
Forest and stalk: The short length makes it very smooth when it is narrow and generally crowded and bumpy. Easy to get down for narrow passages.
Puckel: Too heavy and stiff to be optimal. Short length, however, compensates for something. Soft puppy is OK.
Pist: Perfect in both long and short turns. Press and it's like a slalom skiing or lying and cruising at 60-70 km / h without any problems. OK, it's not fast-paced as a grand slalom, but not far from.
Ice: Nice ice grip, but not more.
Summarizing a skid that is good at most and fits those who just want a ski, which likes short-sleeving and that goes quite mixed pist and offpiste. The M9 thinks I'm at least as all-round and it may be traveled for a slightly longer length, as it's a bit softer than the M10.
The ski gets a 5th for all-round qualities, but of course there are better skis for both off-piste and pist, but not in the same package.
For the right length of the ski, visit http://www.backcountry.com/store/sizingchart.html?sizing_id=149
A general tip is not to choose this ski too long, because then it loses some of the properties without making it much better.
Riders weight: 73 kg
I now have 10 days on two different pairs of M10, a pair of 171 cm and a pair of 164 cm. I weight 73kg myself and find that 171cm is too stiff for me, the weight is not enough to get a good edge on ice. 164 cm, however, is quite suitable for the vast majority of conditions, since it is a rigid and heavy skid with good stability. However, the short length means that the balance can be a problem. It is important not to get too far behind, without standing in the middle of the ski all the time.
Now I have mostly gone on racing and skating skis and do not have so much experience of clean offpiste skiing, so my impressions are based on this. I've driven the ski in a lot of different conditions, about 60% offpiste of varying kinds and 40% piste. Here I think it behaves in these different circumstances:
Pillows: The width makes it flow well. Perhaps a bit of a cut for really high traffic, but another cannon ski.
Croped offpist: Here is the best. You can drive the way you want and it just plows through everything.
Forest and stalk: The short length makes it very smooth when it is narrow and generally crowded and bumpy. Easy to get down for narrow passages.
Puckel: Too heavy and stiff to be optimal. Short length, however, compensates for something. Soft puppy is OK.
Pist: Perfect in both long and short turns. Press and it's like a slalom skiing or lying and cruising at 60-70 km / h without any problems. OK, it's not fast-paced as a grand slalom, but not far from.
Ice: Nice ice grip, but not more.
Summarizing a skid that is good at most and fits those who just want a ski, which likes short-sleeving and that goes quite mixed pist and offpiste. The M9 thinks I'm at least as all-round and it may be traveled for a slightly longer length, as it's a bit softer than the M10.
The ski gets a 5th for all-round qualities, but of course there are better skis for both off-piste and pist, but not in the same package.
For the right length of the ski, visit http://www.backcountry.com/store/sizingchart.html?sizing_id=149
A general tip is not to choose this ski too long, because then it loses some of the properties without making it much better.
Riders weight: 73 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original