Atomic R:11.20
Model year: 2003
What do you think about Atomic R:11.20?
5
4
3
2
1
after a health season in the mountain world. Have tested the skis and its limits a bit more. Have been really well with the ski. Has tried on the grand slalom, ski cross and puckle and has to admit that it works really well in everything, even pillows. However, if you are only looking for carving rides, then this skiing may be wrong. then I would put on a skid with a narrower radius.
Thank you "at ya mmic" for a full ski ...
Model year: 2002
Thank you "at ya mmic" for a full ski ...
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Just returned from the long week in Val d'Isère. In the name of the truth, there was not much "brantåkning" but a lot of heavy sneeze / shortage of crowds and a lot of pistachios in different circumstances. My review above remains largely. Additionally, I am very impressed with stability and ruggedness in difficult / tough conditions (despite the slight length of the ski). When I go right the skis return a lot. Puckel was not a success, but it was also not expected. For only farming, R: EX or Sugar Daddy applies, but when you spend the most time in the mountains, R: 11.20 feels like an excellent option. My weak 5 remains.
Model year: 2002
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Do you think the ski is formable!
Have iofs only spent a week with them but go to Italy in 2 years and there they will be tested better! :)
Little tongue, I have to say, No ski I would like to have with me on a top trip (without a hellicopter ...)
In the pistan it worked out well! but as stated above, it works best in high traffic.
But I give it a MVG-minus because of 1. weighs 2. it's a bit stiff in low turns
But an excellent all-round ski!
Model year: 2002
Have iofs only spent a week with them but go to Italy in 2 years and there they will be tested better! :)
Little tongue, I have to say, No ski I would like to have with me on a top trip (without a hellicopter ...)
In the pistan it worked out well! but as stated above, it works best in high traffic.
But I give it a MVG-minus because of 1. weighs 2. it's a bit stiff in low turns
But an excellent all-round ski!
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
I think the ski is easy to ride comfortably easy to jump with so that's my recession
Model year: 2002
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Have driven the ski in just under two months in the Alps now.
Have not had any really good and custom skis before. But these were, without saying that they are perfect for me, damn good!
I have tested them in probably all the bowls from avalanche to deep snow.
The skid, with sharp edges, is grumpy (!) In tough piste and has a wonderful ice grip. Most beautiful in half-sized turns, but still ok, smooth yet. In the pillows, the bearing is really good in my opinion, and then I drive (190 cm 90kg) on a pair of 180 cm of skis ..
Not so funny maybe bus-go and jump, but otherwise I do not think you get a more fun, versatile and more stable ski at that price!
A canoe purchase !!
Model year: 2002
Have not had any really good and custom skis before. But these were, without saying that they are perfect for me, damn good!
I have tested them in probably all the bowls from avalanche to deep snow.
The skid, with sharp edges, is grumpy (!) In tough piste and has a wonderful ice grip. Most beautiful in half-sized turns, but still ok, smooth yet. In the pillows, the bearing is really good in my opinion, and then I drive (190 cm 90kg) on a pair of 180 cm of skis ..
Not so funny maybe bus-go and jump, but otherwise I do not think you get a more fun, versatile and more stable ski at that price!
A canoe purchase !!
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Incredibly stable ski! Gets like the train on both hard and soft surfaces. It is best at long turns at high speed but is also quite ok at short distance. My 170 cm layer (I'm 176 cm, 73 kg) may mean you do not have to work so much to get around. Good ice grip and excellent outside the piste. Has so far ruled for 3 weeks in the Swedish mountains. Will be tested in France later this spring.
Model year: 2002
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
A very good ski, stable and hugely thorny. Very fast-paced and good edge grip, but it requires a part of an active rider. However, I experienced it as something dumb and a little without feeling ...
... like going to a very good prostitute, which draws the grade down.
Model year: 2001
... like going to a very good prostitute, which draws the grade down.
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Just come home from a few cold days in the mountains.
Have driven on a pair of 180. Is itself 185 and about 75kg.
Can only say that it feels a bit plankier than the Crossmax 10P, but the high and the ice grip are so much better. Maybe a little heavy if you want a bus ski but the ride it offers is very wonderful.
Press to and it responds with a lovely kick both in short and long turns.
Even very fast-wearing, which favors hard carving on hard backs ...
Model year: 2001
Have driven on a pair of 180. Is itself 185 and about 75kg.
Can only say that it feels a bit plankier than the Crossmax 10P, but the high and the ice grip are so much better. Maybe a little heavy if you want a bus ski but the ride it offers is very wonderful.
Press to and it responds with a lovely kick both in short and long turns.
Even very fast-wearing, which favors hard carving on hard backs ...
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Tried the ski for a day, only a piste (but it's not where you go the most, even if you usually say you're offpist;)).
This skid fled very well in piste, but required some speed before getting any of it. It was dead at lower speeds and it was quite timely to get short-range to flow well. Edge to edge was the right one. To lie and toss with medium-length turns it works, but the long radius makes it a bit boring.
But there is no way that the skid is meant to be driven, in long turns (ie at high speed). Then the ski wakes up, it turns well and it's a heavy kick out of the turn. I went at 170 (which is a bit short for me) but it was surprisingly stable.
The ice-grip was not what I had expected, sure the grip is shaky, but you have to edge a lot before it starts grabbing. Approved but not more.
Summary:
Cruel at high speed and long turns, but power is required. Nice ice grip. Too long radius gives dull performance in short-range and lower speeds.
Model year: 2002
This skid fled very well in piste, but required some speed before getting any of it. It was dead at lower speeds and it was quite timely to get short-range to flow well. Edge to edge was the right one. To lie and toss with medium-length turns it works, but the long radius makes it a bit boring.
But there is no way that the skid is meant to be driven, in long turns (ie at high speed). Then the ski wakes up, it turns well and it's a heavy kick out of the turn. I went at 170 (which is a bit short for me) but it was surprisingly stable.
The ice-grip was not what I had expected, sure the grip is shaky, but you have to edge a lot before it starts grabbing. Approved but not more.
Summary:
Cruel at high speed and long turns, but power is required. Nice ice grip. Too long radius gives dull performance in short-range and lower speeds.
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Have tried the ski one day. It's terribly stable, but does not swing as much as you want. A ski you have to go on ... will return in a few weeks
Model year: 2002
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original