Atomic Sugar Daddy (Page 2)

A really stable ski that is good in all offpist. Best of all, on open surfaces where you can burn a lot. In the piste it is right dead but you can carve in feeeta turns.

Length: 183cm

Model year: 2003
Riders weight: 83 kg

run telemark at 173 suckadaddy ie without atomic plates as they become very light (relative to the width). With telemarketing, just forget about the piste. Fat flow in big turns outside the piste, a real surfing!

Model year: 2003
Riders weight: 70 kg

The skid's correct element is a good bit outside the piste and it works really well, pillows like junk snow. But to get there, you have to carry or radonate with these lead beads ... So gone with the atomic plate and bond. Have you kissed a lot of porridge and do not be afraid of very high speeds, do it even in a piste preferably ice free piste then ...

Model year: 2003
Riders weight: 75 kg

Missing what makes it a REALLY good ski. It's suddenly not very wide with today's measure and you wonder how Atomic managed to completely remove all the ice-cap functions on it. If you have a ski pulley and wrap it's very good, but as an all-purpose shelf it sucks ... Comparison with the asteroid or scratch that is just as good in the off-piste but that's also a great deal of ice grip in.

Model year: 2003
Riders weight: 75 kg

Super skiing for big mountains, perfect for smaller riders who think big-daddy gets too big. rellatively easy and stable, playful just like snorkeling. great to drop clippers until you find that the 614 binding does not hold a goal. I weigh about 65 kilos net and had to screw the tie to the bottom. yet it resolved occasionally. thus turned off the binding, including the disc, and put on tyrolia dp10 +? your 7-17 ... now it works like hell and it looks much more hot one with atomic ties. had given it 5 in grades if there were no discs that would only fit the nuclear ties.
buy it, but without any bindings!

Model year: 2003

Bought ski this winter and put 7tm telisbinding on it. It was screwed down into the plate on the skis, but is not sure how it was done. The screw holes do not really fit. Skia goes like a bullet in the offpiste. Feels very calm, even though it's short (173), just as long as myself. When it's hard, skiing is not as good. To wide to icy hill. But you do not buy this ski if you're just standing in the ground. I think it is fairly easy run and easy to control, even with telis binding. Well worth the money I paid in any case. 4000 nkr with binding.

Model year: 2003

The sight of skiing was very good in technical driving, but it will be too short for me in off-piste. The negative is that the skies weigh too much with the Atomic bindings and the plate. The bindings are too bad! Had it been and got in 193cm, I'd definitely bought it.

Model year: 2003

to Peter Lind a small rectangular 193 cm model e only for Atomics pro riders and not coming to the stores ...
A cruel skiing ...
why sail optimist dinghy when you can drive a plane ship ....

Model year: 2003

What do you say, like driving a new SAAB 9-3 sport sedan, a big smile under the helmet ... there should be big areas, but it's almost funeral if it's a bit upset ...

Model year: 2003

Some corrections to this article ... * The ski was designed by Atomic Freeride Team, AFT, which has been running 2 years now ..
(International and not US)
* Sugar Daddy is a smaller and more useful version of Big Daddy, with a small twintip twintip skid that is made for both pipe and offpist is called STOMP and has dimensions like 10 EX, inlay it for it's also rocking fat. ..
* Sugar Daddy comes in 193cm to next season
* Also grab in the new SkierCross ski "SuperCross" that comes, so rackarns go

Model year: 2003