Atomic Tweak (Page 2)

++ design
+ light
++ price worth

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 4 kg

Went on the 172th and thought they were all right. They were a bit unstable in the piste and could float in long carving turns. They were easy and worked well in the park. Unfortunately, I could not go off-piste so I know nothing about it.
Weight of the pitcher: 65 Kg

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 65 kg

The most beautiful ski I've tried so far I've tried 1080s too ... I think the ski was easy in the air and that it was stable in the back easily approved by me !!

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 65 kg

stable skis! nice in the air, good backhill skiing, nice pistons and pillows skiing, but more suitable for the park!
+ design
+ lightweight
+ piste, pillows, park

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 60 kg

This is a very good twintip ski, I think. Are happy with the purchase. As a bonus, they are also very nice.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 68 kg

Went with 172an telis during a day in mixed before. It had been told me that it would not be possible to go telis but I'm not sure. When other skis go as a train on the slope, you can have fun with this ski. Things are happening all the time and it is relatively witty from side to side. The fact that they are also good in the air is a bonus.
Maybe not something for those who want a stable ski but definitely something for those who want it fun.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 70 kg

I went telis on this ski and I went on 172n. I thought it was quite a bit of a pocket pocket rocket in a smaller format. litte sladrida and anxious. but cruel light and jump along. not because I am an expert in the field but they are easy. good twin tip.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 70 kg

they are not so much up bent there behind.
But otherwise they are cruel.

Model year: 2003