Dynastar Trouble Maker (Page 5)

well i have gone to trouble maker team (same skid in junior) all winter they were beautiful and stable in
landing. good to go switch with. this was my first twintip ski and i was happy

+ they change forgings from green to purple to red

+ stable landings

+ good to switch switch

- Replace easily

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 60 kg

After a whole winter on these skis, I have come to the conclusion that it is really good.
I mounted it 4 cm forward and it was a good choice. They are getting a little messy offpiste but you'll figure it out after a while. I think they work well, stable at high speed. I managed really well "SPS-approved" shortcuts on them as well.
The only real drawback I've found is that the steel edges are quite wet. After a lot of railings, I murdered the steel edge, it went off in two places and was pushed under the belt. It could be done but now I have discovered that it has gone elsewhere as well.

+ Cruel skiing that works a lot

-Mixed steel edges

Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 95 kg

I have to say that the upper side sucks in total ... after being in the Alps v.8, they looked like hell on the top side. big scratches, deep jack. bought them before Christmas so it's a little sad that you have to buy new next year type !!. I have not noticed that the steel edges are easy to loosen even though I have driven over stones and various other things. In the park they are an undergirl, but in alps there was no park so the only thing was that they died in that park. (know more in park after v.16) in the razor, they worked very well to be jibbskida (175cm and is 185cm) in the piste you could burn well really because I did not feel any flutter lr got that way .. tested a friend's enemy and I have to say that mys worked better ..: D so they get a 3/5 because of scratches

Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 75 kg

Very nice skiing in both the park and the piste, have not tested it outside. The design is quite true, both belly and upper side, however, scratches are quite easy on the top, but scratches are nothing to get away with any skiing.

Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 75 kg

incredibly beautiful skid which is easily damaged on the top side ...

Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 50 kg

very nice and stable skiing works well in "forest skiing" and in the park even in the piste. The only thing that draws down the score is that the top side is scratched easily but otherwise okay skiing

Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 74 kg

Thought this guy's tongue without good shakes in the piste, a little too soft for my taste.

Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 68 kg

very good skiing works as well in the piste as in the park. Great fun to jump with works well on a bit of hard ground like ice. quite sensitive to scratches, the surface of the upper side is scratched easily

Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 70 kg

I got my TM just before Christmas, before they had 1080 and I was pleased with them because they were easy and nice but after a half of a season, the tips sprained there after many fakie landings and crap. I think TM is damn good They are light and ahr good flex but those scratches do not bother me so much because they have such a cruel design. A ski at low cost with good features in the park. Buy the ski and 1080 bindings.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 60 kg

This is a good park ski, but it is surprisingly good in powder. Being said very scratched on the surface, but who cares ... Damn fun when they change colors from where you see them. They are good at switchlandings and are very stable at high speed. Very soft skis. Anbefales! And very easy, but with Look P12 Jib bindings it's not that easy anymore !!

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 65 kg