Head Cyber 26 X TPS
Model year: 1998
What do you think about Head Cyber 26 X TPS?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
maneuverable ski, with good flex, good response, and forgiving at higher speeds.
Weaknesses:
Edge hold is questionable for very fast skiing for hard chargers I would go with something beefier. For an intermediate to advanced skiier this would be a perfect choice. could probably find them for 100 dollars nowadays
Summary:
Adequate ski for the intermediate to advanced 'lighter weight' skier who is looking for an agile ski while still being able to handle high speed arcs.
Riding style: carving ski
Length on the ski: 180 cm
Riders weight: 127 kg
maneuverable ski, with good flex, good response, and forgiving at higher speeds.
Weaknesses:
Edge hold is questionable for very fast skiing for hard chargers I would go with something beefier. For an intermediate to advanced skiier this would be a perfect choice. could probably find them for 100 dollars nowadays
Summary:
Adequate ski for the intermediate to advanced 'lighter weight' skier who is looking for an agile ski while still being able to handle high speed arcs.
Riding style: carving ski
Length on the ski: 180 cm
Riders weight: 127 kg
Working at sports shop selling head skid, superb buy, can not get more value for money get to the winter if you are smart better buy can not be done, ...
/ jocke
Model year: 1998
/ jocke
Model year: 1998
Translated by Google ・ Show original
I bought my skis without testing first, which is less good. The first time I stood on them I did not like them at all. But after a few days of innings, I liked them sharply. Tried a couple of old straight skis (Rossignol carbon something) after I went on here for about 2 weeks and freaked out what they felt sloppy in the turns. However, cyber 26 requires some speed to get it right. I think this is a good ski, witty and with an incredible edge grip. 5 stars.
/ Erik
Model year: 1998
/ Erik
Model year: 1998
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Never tried hourglass. Laughed loudly the first two rides. Cannon. Tip. Do not buy too short I'm 172 cm and have always driven at 2 meters, they recommended 170 cm, but I took 190 cm calas!
SEN this with bindings, the Intersport niss said it was ok to move over my salon (747E) without plates, now I'm falling into steep slopes when the inner skirt's pants
scratches on the hill.
/ Petteri Cost
Model year: 1997
SEN this with bindings, the Intersport niss said it was ok to move over my salon (747E) without plates, now I'm falling into steep slopes when the inner skirt's pants
scratches on the hill.
/ Petteri Cost
Model year: 1997
Translated by Google ・ Show original
This is a ski I like.
Before I bought these, I did what all the intruders should do, I tested a number of skis. I rented a couple of skis first and went to get a "snowman" and then I went and tried some different models (HEAD 26X, Dynastar X9, HEAD World Cup)
Dynastar X9 is a cannon skid, but it still did not feel as lively as the HEAD 26X. I thought it was a little older design than HEAD. You simply have to work a bit more with the skis to make them wander.
The HEAD World Cup is a snap, but it requires a little more. You have to go a bit more aggressive simply. A bit more stable at peak speed than 26X, but it's harder to just ice cream. If I lived so you could go every day so
these would probably be in the top. Otherwise they are a little expensive.
The HEAD Cyber 26X is lively. It's easy to get them in turn and you can hold them a little longer and get long turns. The ice grip is completely OK. The front ends "beat" a bit on top speed,
but not so that you feel losing the grip.
By the way, I can only say that there is a big difference on today's skis and ten year old skis :-)
/ Roger Lundberg
Model year: 1997
Before I bought these, I did what all the intruders should do, I tested a number of skis. I rented a couple of skis first and went to get a "snowman" and then I went and tried some different models (HEAD 26X, Dynastar X9, HEAD World Cup)
Dynastar X9 is a cannon skid, but it still did not feel as lively as the HEAD 26X. I thought it was a little older design than HEAD. You simply have to work a bit more with the skis to make them wander.
The HEAD World Cup is a snap, but it requires a little more. You have to go a bit more aggressive simply. A bit more stable at peak speed than 26X, but it's harder to just ice cream. If I lived so you could go every day so
these would probably be in the top. Otherwise they are a little expensive.
The HEAD Cyber 26X is lively. It's easy to get them in turn and you can hold them a little longer and get long turns. The ice grip is completely OK. The front ends "beat" a bit on top speed,
but not so that you feel losing the grip.
By the way, I can only say that there is a big difference on today's skis and ten year old skis :-)
/ Roger Lundberg
Model year: 1997
Translated by Google ・ Show original