Rossignol B2

Rossignol B2
Brand: Rossignol
Model year: 2005

What do you think about Rossignol B2?
5
4
3
2
1
Eastern Canada Skier
Eastern Canada Skier (Guest)
17/08/2008
Strengths:
Easy to ski. Better for soft snow but still predictable on hard snow. Very 'loose' and forgiving. Easy to steer or pivot but will carves well on smooth surfaces. Very relaxed ride in softer snow and in bumps.

Weaknesses:
Nothing that would not be expected of a mid-fat on hard icy snow. Will chatter on hard turns on hard snow. Feels too soft at high speeds especially if rough snow conditions. Slow edge to edge when carving.

Summary:
Relaxed easy to ski for soft conditions but still adequate on hard snow as long as speed not too high.

Model year: 2004
Length on the ski: 176 cm
Riders weight: 82 kg
Riders length: 175 cm

Cyberphoto rockar fett
Cyberphoto rockar fett (Guest)
13/09/2006
Strengths:
- Good grip on ice
- Speed ​​stability
- Nice
- Turret (better than newer B2: or)
- Answers badly when you press
- Moves legally in pillows but ...

Weaknesses:
- ... B3 or B4 fits better for "proper" powder shooting
- Cost a slant (but worth the money)

Summary:
Probably the best ski I have traveled. Incredibly allround, good at all.

Riding style: Pillows (preferably) and piste (unfortunately predominantly)
Length on the ski: 182 cm
Riders weight: 85 kg
Riders length: 182 cm

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
gymnastjohan
30/10/2005
Strengths:
Very speed-capable skis with good ice grip and overall very nice in the piste.
Does not require a lot of speed or power, yet gives good response when pushing and when it's faster.
In slopes and slopes, they work well thanks to the extra width (compared to pistes)

Nice design.

They provide a beautiful sound in landings.

Floats well in loosnö (but have not drowned too much rubbish with them yet)

Weaknesses:
Can imagine that the width is not quite enough for the deepest powder.

The price is quite high, though the corresponding models cost about the same amount.

Summary:
Very nice skiing, which is especially good in the piste.
Then it's perfect with only a couple of skis that work in all conditions.

The 182 is definitely not too long for me. Glad I chose this length and not 176an.

Riding style: Ski / Powder
Length on the ski: 182 cm
Riders weight: 75 kg
Riders length: 185 cm

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
N/A
(Guest)
27/09/2005
Strengths:
Turns on a femur ring

Weaknesses:
Flattriga in higher fares

Summary:
Spent the season 03-04 in Val d'Isere on B2. (telemark) I chose 190 cm to get more lift in pillows and better grip at high speeds, which can easily be a tendency for snow. Even though I feel that this skier is swinging on a femoral sledge, it will be a bit confusing in the woods at telemark skiing with such a long run. (nothing wrong with the ski - my choice to have a longer variant) Unless you do not mind feeling the taste of barr, understand. In any case, it is an excellent ski for telemark because it is soft and easy to get into the hill without much power. Unfortunately, it will be a bit soft and fast-moving in extremely high traffic. By the way, the design is stylish, which is always an advantage I've heard.

Model year: 2004
Riding style: Pistons and pillows with telemark
Length on the ski: 190 cm
Riders weight: 80 kg
Riders length: 186 cm

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Dominique
Dominique (Guest)
18/04/2005
Classic ski (and thanks for it) that can handle both piste and park and pillows.
Guaranteed the right ski for virtually any rider, in one week no one discovered any disadvantages. My view is that the simplicity of the ski (even designally) only reinforces the experience. Thank you for many nice days in Italian lice and pistons.

Riders weight: 76 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Robbott
18/04/2005
They tested a week in the Monterosa area (Gressoney, Alagna and Champoluc) and received half a meter of fresh snow. In the powder they were really fun to go with. Maybe maybe a bit more flow, but given that they only have 76 mm they are really good.
In the sorbet offpiste they were also really fun. Easy to get around and to handle.
So so long as it's soft they are good. Offpiste as a piste.

However, when it started to be hard, crowded and hard, it was impossible to trust them properly. Then they felt too soft and not very safe. But you can not get everything here in the world.
If you want to buy these skis depends on the taste. If you only want to go in snow, you should definitely buy them, but you should remember that it's hard to drive when it's hard. I myself prefer a tougher ski that can be pressed more.

Riders weight: 73 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Coqrouge
11/02/2005
Huge fun skiing.
Went around with my high leather shoes Garmont Race in Åre during the test weekend and drove what went.
If I had not had the ears, the flint had passed all over my head.
Similar to the features of my Head Monster IM70 from 2003, but even better and more fun on everything.

Totally wonderful skiing.
High speed, short turn, super G turn, jump pads etc etc.
Soft and gentle but still fast for me.

Do you have a ski purchase B2.

Riders weight: 75 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
sahlen1987
30/12/2004
have driven it for a week now in ice piste and two dm heavy wet snow. It worked well as a fan of everything.
The ice grip felt I felt very safe. worked well in the fakie ride even though it is rear mounted. generally cruel

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 70 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
ChamBenkeYxan
27/08/2004
Really fun skis No difference except the graphics (the color) compared to the previous year model

Riders weight: 80 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Richi
18/02/2004
Tjejskida ... Too soft and windy. The old bandit is better ..

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 78 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original