Rossignol Pow Air 178 Grind
Model year: 2002
What do you think about Rossignol Pow Air 178 Grind?
5
4
3
2
1
Whole skiing, which does not just go well in the hill, it's pretty nice in the park. Weighs almost nothing. The only negative is that they are a little too narrow at my waist. In other words, it works in pillows. I also think the design is fresch which never hurts.
Riders weight: 95 kg
Riders weight: 95 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
I'm not very much like jibber and generally only on German quality ski, so watching me on a pair of Rossignol Pow Air is a bit of a rule-correcting exception. In addition, I really only like skido that has some racing feeling in itself and a good cut and a little bit of kick. That's why with some skepticism I clicked on these short storytables.
However, I was VERY positively surprised. It feels right that this is a real-core ski and a good construction. For a play ski in this long and wide class, it feels close enough just as I want it. The skid is capable of good speed, lies superficially in the cutting edge and kicks off well. The baken I drove in was medium and on the occasional ice spots, it was obvious that the Pow was not a race race, but it should not be either.
Pow Air is easily the best ski I tried that was not made by my usual favorite factory. It is recommended directly for skiers who do not have access to large slopes and free speed but want to get some more of the slopes by squeezing some extra turns, tricks and jumps.
HWC HitMe
Model year: 2001
However, I was VERY positively surprised. It feels right that this is a real-core ski and a good construction. For a play ski in this long and wide class, it feels close enough just as I want it. The skid is capable of good speed, lies superficially in the cutting edge and kicks off well. The baken I drove in was medium and on the occasional ice spots, it was obvious that the Pow was not a race race, but it should not be either.
Pow Air is easily the best ski I tried that was not made by my usual favorite factory. It is recommended directly for skiers who do not have access to large slopes and free speed but want to get some more of the slopes by squeezing some extra turns, tricks and jumps.
HWC HitMe
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Have been going to Rossignol throughout my life, and will continue to do so too ...
Model year: 2000
Model year: 2000
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Old skiers like me, I do not mind skiing, but would like to try jibba on skis on board, and I think the ski was actually very easy. It has a clearer directional cut than 1080 etc and you are not completely centered, which makes me think it was more light-weighted and faster than 1080, and backwards you go the most for or after a jump, then you want to go fast ... Overall, I think it was really fun, but I do not have that much experience either, so most of the time will be fun just for that reason.
Model year: 2001
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
A good and stable ski that makes you want!
The fact that Svalasnubben had a problem with landing backwards, I do not think so much about skiing!
A very good ski.
Model year: 2000
The fact that Svalasnubben had a problem with landing backwards, I do not think so much about skiing!
A very good ski.
Model year: 2000
Translated by Google ・ Show original