Rossignol PP 7 S
Model year: 2003
What do you think about Rossignol PP 7 S?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
Stable in speed, actually goes best when driving a bit harder.
Also works offpiste with a lot of backweight.
Fun if you can ski.
Weaknesses:
Requires a lot of leg muscles :)
Difficult to get good turns with if you are above.
Nothing too small narrow slopes, then it will only be difficult.
Summary:
I would probably have bought a shorter slide of this model.
Or even better, bought a softer ski;)
Nothing for beginners like me ...
Riding style: Piste
Length on the ski: 167 cm
Riders weight: 80 kg
Riders length: 176 cm
Stable in speed, actually goes best when driving a bit harder.
Also works offpiste with a lot of backweight.
Fun if you can ski.
Weaknesses:
Requires a lot of leg muscles :)
Difficult to get good turns with if you are above.
Nothing too small narrow slopes, then it will only be difficult.
Summary:
I would probably have bought a shorter slide of this model.
Or even better, bought a softer ski;)
Nothing for beginners like me ...
Riding style: Piste
Length on the ski: 167 cm
Riders weight: 80 kg
Riders length: 176 cm
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Must say I was convinced of these skis. Very nice and rewards a well-turned turn with a good kick. Have not yet tested ice piste with these skis, but on normal to soft surfaces they go as the train.
Have not found anything negative with them, well imagine that I probably fall under the category skiers slightly better than the average skier. Therefore, I have probably not taken out the max of them yet, but they are trusting.
Be a little uncertain about the choice of length .... is itself 185 cm and slightly heavier than the average, 174 cm is excellent, has heard from several sources independently of each other that this ski should be traveled in a slightly shorter length than usual. It seems to be true for my ride style, medium-speed swings at fairly high speed.
With this, my choice of skiing is made ... Can urge all skiers in this category to test these skis before jumping off o buying some others ... Certainly, not everyone in taste but in my opinion a top ski. The fact that they have a nice design does not make things worse ... :-)
(Same appearance as PP 9X)
Model year: 2002
Have not found anything negative with them, well imagine that I probably fall under the category skiers slightly better than the average skier. Therefore, I have probably not taken out the max of them yet, but they are trusting.
Be a little uncertain about the choice of length .... is itself 185 cm and slightly heavier than the average, 174 cm is excellent, has heard from several sources independently of each other that this ski should be traveled in a slightly shorter length than usual. It seems to be true for my ride style, medium-speed swings at fairly high speed.
With this, my choice of skiing is made ... Can urge all skiers in this category to test these skis before jumping off o buying some others ... Certainly, not everyone in taste but in my opinion a top ski. The fact that they have a nice design does not make things worse ... :-)
(Same appearance as PP 9X)
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original