Salomon Crossmax 8
Model year: 2003
Compare
What do you think about Salomon Crossmax 8?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
amazing ski
Weaknesses:
none
Summary:
just bought these for my mate ed so i hope he likes them. They are amazing.
Model year: 2003
Length on the ski: 180 cm
Riders weight: 127 kg
Riders length: 180 cm
amazing ski
Weaknesses:
none
Summary:
just bought these for my mate ed so i hope he likes them. They are amazing.
Model year: 2003
Length on the ski: 180 cm
Riders weight: 127 kg
Riders length: 180 cm
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Show original
Nice ... Works well in both offpiste and in the piste. Then the design is pretty nice too. =) Thinks it's a cannon ski. Will be a lot of fun in the spring with this ski!
Model year: 2003
Model year: 2003
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Show original
They are quite clear, bought my for over 5000 last year when the model came. But I regret that I did not give an extra thousand lip to get the crossmax 8x pilot model.
Model year: 2001
Model year: 2001
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Show original
Running this ski 2 weeks ago at Beitostølen - where there are very (!) "Nice" trails.
The skis are made comfortable, comfortable, "cozy". But a little exciting ... It's perfect for those who want a "nice" skiing that's good enough in regular trams, for regular driving.
If you really squeeze it and give it more difficult snow / ice conditions, the weaknesses will occur.
It has a fare stability that limits itself to "regular" driving. The ice grip is OK - that's far from good enough. In powder it flies on its width; without having striking properties. In bumps, it's fine enough. Short turns go well, longer turns go well. A good ski! But boring!
This is an Ok all-round ski for those who want a ski without either one or the other property. OK price (in Norway: NOK 3,500, -) relative to the properties.
Probably it's a ski man, too, get tired of !! There are no challenges at all ...
Here at freeride.nu I miss discussion on my favorites: K2 Axis X Pro / Mod X Pro and K2 Merlin VI and Merlin IV. THIS is skiing that does the job!
Comments, please?
Model year: 2002
The skis are made comfortable, comfortable, "cozy". But a little exciting ... It's perfect for those who want a "nice" skiing that's good enough in regular trams, for regular driving.
If you really squeeze it and give it more difficult snow / ice conditions, the weaknesses will occur.
It has a fare stability that limits itself to "regular" driving. The ice grip is OK - that's far from good enough. In powder it flies on its width; without having striking properties. In bumps, it's fine enough. Short turns go well, longer turns go well. A good ski! But boring!
This is an Ok all-round ski for those who want a ski without either one or the other property. OK price (in Norway: NOK 3,500, -) relative to the properties.
Probably it's a ski man, too, get tired of !! There are no challenges at all ...
Here at freeride.nu I miss discussion on my favorites: K2 Axis X Pro / Mod X Pro and K2 Merlin VI and Merlin IV. THIS is skiing that does the job!
Comments, please?
Model year: 2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Show original
Have just returned from two weeks of powder pumping in Val Thorens. thought they were excellent both offpist as a pist.
combined with a pair of x-wave 8: or (boots), they became a rubbish feeling.
the price is definitely worth it.
chose without a pilot because I thought there was too much money for anything that was not particularly necessary if you have a couple of good standard bindings.
Model year: 2002
combined with a pair of x-wave 8: or (boots), they became a rubbish feeling.
the price is definitely worth it.
chose without a pilot because I thought there was too much money for anything that was not particularly necessary if you have a couple of good standard bindings.
Model year: 2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Show original
This I think was a very good and affordable ski. The feeling was quite ok. The negative with this ski was that it was a bit too heavy.
Model year: 2002
Model year: 2002