Salomon Crossmax 8
Model year: 2003
What do you think about Salomon Crossmax 8?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
amazing ski
Weaknesses:
none
Summary:
just bought these for my mate ed so i hope he likes them. They are amazing.
Model year: 2003
Length on the ski: 180 cm
Riders weight: 127 kg
Riders length: 180 cm
amazing ski
Weaknesses:
none
Summary:
just bought these for my mate ed so i hope he likes them. They are amazing.
Model year: 2003
Length on the ski: 180 cm
Riders weight: 127 kg
Riders length: 180 cm
Strengths:
Stable-speed-race
Weaknesses:
No
Summary:
Top 3
Model year: 2014
Riding style: Piste
Length on the ski: 185 cm
Riders weight: 95 kg
Riders length: 189 cm
Stable-speed-race
Weaknesses:
No
Summary:
Top 3
Model year: 2014
Riding style: Piste
Length on the ski: 185 cm
Riders weight: 95 kg
Riders length: 189 cm
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Nice ... Works well in both offpiste and in the piste. Then the design is pretty nice too. =) Thinks it's a cannon ski. Will be a lot of fun in the spring with this ski!
Model year: 2003
Model year: 2003
Translated by Google ・ Show original
They are quite clear, bought my for over 5000 last year when the model came. But I regret that I did not give an extra thousand lip to get the crossmax 8x pilot model.
Model year: 2001
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Running this ski 2 weeks ago at Beitostølen - where there are very (!) "Nice" trails.
The skis are made comfortable, comfortable, "cozy". But a little exciting ... It's perfect for those who want a "nice" skiing that's good enough in regular trams, for regular driving.
If you really squeeze it and give it more difficult snow / ice conditions, the weaknesses will occur.
It has a fare stability that limits itself to "regular" driving. The ice grip is OK - that's far from good enough. In powder it flies on its width; without having striking properties. In bumps, it's fine enough. Short turns go well, longer turns go well. A good ski! But boring!
This is an Ok all-round ski for those who want a ski without either one or the other property. OK price (in Norway: NOK 3,500, -) relative to the properties.
Probably it's a ski man, too, get tired of !! There are no challenges at all ...
Here at freeride.nu I miss discussion on my favorites: K2 Axis X Pro / Mod X Pro and K2 Merlin VI and Merlin IV. THIS is skiing that does the job!
Comments, please?
Model year: 2002
The skis are made comfortable, comfortable, "cozy". But a little exciting ... It's perfect for those who want a "nice" skiing that's good enough in regular trams, for regular driving.
If you really squeeze it and give it more difficult snow / ice conditions, the weaknesses will occur.
It has a fare stability that limits itself to "regular" driving. The ice grip is OK - that's far from good enough. In powder it flies on its width; without having striking properties. In bumps, it's fine enough. Short turns go well, longer turns go well. A good ski! But boring!
This is an Ok all-round ski for those who want a ski without either one or the other property. OK price (in Norway: NOK 3,500, -) relative to the properties.
Probably it's a ski man, too, get tired of !! There are no challenges at all ...
Here at freeride.nu I miss discussion on my favorites: K2 Axis X Pro / Mod X Pro and K2 Merlin VI and Merlin IV. THIS is skiing that does the job!
Comments, please?
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Have just returned from two weeks of powder pumping in Val Thorens. thought they were excellent both offpist as a pist.
combined with a pair of x-wave 8: or (boots), they became a rubbish feeling.
the price is definitely worth it.
chose without a pilot because I thought there was too much money for anything that was not particularly necessary if you have a couple of good standard bindings.
Model year: 2002
combined with a pair of x-wave 8: or (boots), they became a rubbish feeling.
the price is definitely worth it.
chose without a pilot because I thought there was too much money for anything that was not particularly necessary if you have a couple of good standard bindings.
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original
This I think was a very good and affordable ski. The feeling was quite ok. The negative with this ski was that it was a bit too heavy.
Model year: 2002
Model year: 2002
Translated by Google ・ Show original