Salomon Teneighty


Brand: Salomon
Modelyear: 2005

What do you think about Salomon Teneighty?
erik_sundstrom
09/12/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
The bells are so much better than the predecessor. Could have bought them unless Team Sportia was so stupid that you could not buy without bindings. So yes bought a couple of food trix instead

Model year: 2003
hardrocker
08/12/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
I think it has the ski, how good is it? went on 161 and worked well ... went well in the piste and good feeling in the jump.
+ nice slide
+ fancy
- a little expensive

Model year: 2003
Erik_S
24/11/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
I recently bought a pair of teneighty orange and I have to say I'm completely satisfied with my purchase, a little expensive maybe but still affordable. + to the design. an absolutely excellent ski in my opinion.

Model year: 2003
Martin_Bech
18/11/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Well, badly fun skis to jump with my 169 cm which makes them not very fun in deep pads or at high speeds in the piste (they start to flatter like all salmon skis)
But carva makes them easy and you do not need any leg muscles to drive with them.

Suffering for its purpose.

silvar
14/11/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Tested a couple of 1080 o they were incredibly beautiful. Best twintipen. Easy. Could be a bit fluttery when you braced but wonderful in the park. Nice design too! =).

Model year: 2002
TheDanne
10/09/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Did borrow a couple (thanks Stefan ..!) When I managed to lock my XP100 into the car ...
Went on them one day and they felt really good. Feel good to both jump and land with good hardness and angle on the tail. However, in really rough traffic, it may be a bit fluttery (170cm) but that's the other side, not done for either.
An easy ski for those who like to jump and ride around and wrap a bit. Despite the measure, worked well outside the piste, it was not bottomless pillows where we were anyway ..

Have it!
// Danne

PS. (Stefan) Hope they managed despite the great crap! DS.

Model year: 2002
DahIin
08/09/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
So they were really beautiful, but they could have a bit harder tail .... when landing with backweight, they were not as stable. But by the way, it's a j *** a grymm ski has just not decided what length yeah will take!

Model year: 2003
Phedrix
26/08/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Very nice ski (silver), not as wide as PR but still wide ... has mostly drowned Telemark on it and it has never gone so fast down for Lundgren-backed. And it's also a really nice cut on the slopes, it's good looking!

Model year: 2003
skibum2004
16/08/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
Really happy with the skis ... Really good price, then you will be successful. However, you will lose weight after fatter (broader) skis when driving on them for a while. But clearly a good buy.

Model year: 2002
jag_martina
15/07/2002
Note! This text has been translated by Google Translate.
Show original
I do not really know what model I have but they are the ones who are holy. I think they are very good. Soft and fits pretty well a girl who does not weigh so much. It's easy to jump with but when you get a bit heavier they will not be as good. They are getting a bit too soft. But otherwise the cannon. Affordable.
* * Martina