Scott Santiago mission
Model year: 2006
What do you think about Scott Santiago mission?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
super versatile, has no boundaries
Weaknesses:
the speed
Summary:
It is a super versatile ski, you can ski wherever snow condition with minimum effort. I would like it to be a bit faster
Model year: 2005
Riding style: powder
Length on the ski: 168 cm
Riders weight: 74 kg
Riders length: 167 cm
super versatile, has no boundaries
Weaknesses:
the speed
Summary:
It is a super versatile ski, you can ski wherever snow condition with minimum effort. I would like it to be a bit faster
Model year: 2005
Riding style: powder
Length on the ski: 168 cm
Riders weight: 74 kg
Riders length: 167 cm
it's a great ski, i'd prefer a rossi bc... the mission is very versatil but some directiv pression sometimes.
Riders weight: 77 kg
Riders weight: 77 kg
178 cm. Fantastic. Very good on croust and rough terrain where pocket rocket fails.
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 76 kg
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 76 kg
Strengths:
Very good allround.
Lovely flow in pillows. Okay, bitten in hard piste. Lightweight o Comprehensive without being awake. Feels stable and withstands fast speed.
Weaknesses:
Is a compromise, ie not the best at all.
Summary:
Have gone from pillow pads to ice pist and am very happy with my purchase. If you want a pair of skis that will work all over the mountain, these are a good option!
Model year: 2005
Riding style: Powder / Ski
Length on the ski: 178 cm
Riders weight: 78 kg
Riders length: 180 cm
Very good allround.
Lovely flow in pillows. Okay, bitten in hard piste. Lightweight o Comprehensive without being awake. Feels stable and withstands fast speed.
Weaknesses:
Is a compromise, ie not the best at all.
Summary:
Have gone from pillow pads to ice pist and am very happy with my purchase. If you want a pair of skis that will work all over the mountain, these are a good option!
Model year: 2005
Riding style: Powder / Ski
Length on the ski: 178 cm
Riders weight: 78 kg
Riders length: 180 cm
Translated by Google ・ Show original
A very nice ski with good all-round characteristics. Works well in pads and sorbé. A bit soft for oily surfaces, but it is also good enough there. A good Scandinavian allmountain ski.
The aggressive cutting makes the ski fun to go with in the piste (observe the radius)
Has tested 2005/06 during Mars and April in Ramundberget and is very pleased.
Can imagine that it works fine fine like Telis too! However, not tested.
A construction error (I hope) was unfortunately revealed to my couple. The coat was cut to scratch 0.8 mm. Discovered this after a tear in the coat. The correct depth should be 1.6 mm. (According to Scott in Germany) As long as the ski is full, it does not matter, but if you want to sand them or maybe. fix them, the life of the skid becomes very short.
Riders weight: 83 kg
The aggressive cutting makes the ski fun to go with in the piste (observe the radius)
Has tested 2005/06 during Mars and April in Ramundberget and is very pleased.
Can imagine that it works fine fine like Telis too! However, not tested.
A construction error (I hope) was unfortunately revealed to my couple. The coat was cut to scratch 0.8 mm. Discovered this after a tear in the coat. The correct depth should be 1.6 mm. (According to Scott in Germany) As long as the ski is full, it does not matter, but if you want to sand them or maybe. fix them, the life of the skid becomes very short.
Riders weight: 83 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Can only agree with most previous reviewers that it feels like a very good all-round ski which, of course, comes best out of the piste. Got some really nice days in Whitewater in Feb / March with about 30cm pillows and then the skis were like a dream ... Highly recommended if you like to go off- than on piste (and who does not? ??)
Fredrik
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 80 kg
Fredrik
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 80 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Just got up in Hemedal and drove on a couple of Santiago, 178'or. They are really good, I have to say. I'm totally in the process of buying a pair for the current season. By the way, they are going to be totally cruel in the puddle :)
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 82 kg
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 82 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Scott Santiago Mission feels very compassionate and soft, even for a weighty easy rider like me. has
tested them in the park, piste and off-piste and they are really fun to ride and work everywhere. Simply one
cruel allround skiing that's not the best at all, but good at all.
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 57 kg
tested them in the park, piste and off-piste and they are really fun to ride and work everywhere. Simply one
cruel allround skiing that's not the best at all, but good at all.
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 57 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Have been spending two weeks on these things on very varied grounds, and I agree with the above. This was exactly what I was looking for; A pair of feet lay well with turn and LAGOM rigidity. They feel stiff in the middle and soft in the boards, and this combined with the progressive cutting radius makes them work very well even in a really hard piste. Of course not as good as a pure pistachio, but much better than, for example, Salomon Scream in my opinion.
The skis swing well if you want to, but are still stable if you drive big turns. The only downside I see with such a narrow radius is in wind-packed fine-grained snow. Thus, typically Swedish kalfjäll. In such a way, they can dig down and turn well tight if you drive really fast, but it is worth looking at the qualities in general.
In soft pillows they flow well and the radius does not feel too tight.
Overall, one can say that this seems to be the only ski in the market that is narrow with a narrow radius, and for those looking for such a slide, I can almost promise you will not be disappointed.
I'm 185 tall, weigh 75 and drive on the 183-skid, which feels good. Would certainly work with 178 as well.
In conclusion, you might wonder why I do not give a 5th? Most seem to give 5ths of anything that's good in general, which is a bit crazy. There are better skis for those who just go skiing or just cushions, and a 4th is therefore badly good.
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 75 kg
The skis swing well if you want to, but are still stable if you drive big turns. The only downside I see with such a narrow radius is in wind-packed fine-grained snow. Thus, typically Swedish kalfjäll. In such a way, they can dig down and turn well tight if you drive really fast, but it is worth looking at the qualities in general.
In soft pillows they flow well and the radius does not feel too tight.
Overall, one can say that this seems to be the only ski in the market that is narrow with a narrow radius, and for those looking for such a slide, I can almost promise you will not be disappointed.
I'm 185 tall, weigh 75 and drive on the 183-skid, which feels good. Would certainly work with 178 as well.
In conclusion, you might wonder why I do not give a 5th? Most seem to give 5ths of anything that's good in general, which is a bit crazy. There are better skis for those who just go skiing or just cushions, and a 4th is therefore badly good.
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 75 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Tried them week 1 in Chamonix. Do not be ideal conditions, a little snow and a lot of rock, but they have still shown what they are going for.
I've tested them in everything from ice pistons, through 40cm untouched, slightly heavy snow, through the puck to the really heavy 30cm slash, which has given me a good feel for the ski.
Starting with general characteristics then. A properly wide ski, but as Scott still pushes down to a radius of about 15 m, this, along with being relatively stable and rigid, such as Scratch BC, gives it really good piste performance. Of course, it's nothing special to come up with when you hit ice, even in really hard surfaces, so you have to fight and edge properly to get hold of it, but in the remaining piste conditions it's very good. There is no skiing as you enter the very shortest turns, (in the pist will say), but that's not why you buy a ski like this. Of course, you can drive short-range, but then you have to work a bit and they do not offer that clip you get from a slalom ski right now.
In some larger turns, however, they invite them to speed and confidence. They are really stable while being so soft that they swallow irregularities smoothly and smoothly. Have before they run on a very hard and stable Atomic ski and I thought I would feel unsure of these at higher rates, but not.
Offpist and puckel then.
It may be a bit scary to be optimal for humpback, but it is still okay when it is compassionate and forgiving in uneven ground. Personally, I'm not a professional at the puck, but I have done a lot and it did not make it any more difficult for me immediately.
So offpiste.
In all circumstances with opistated surfaces, except for hard ice, you will get a ski that you will love, and that will love you back. Because this is where it wants to be! And it's fine even here you planned to keep up if you're thinking about these skis?
Scott Santiago is a nice, yet a very rewarding ski in the offpiste. It comes in very well even in the heaviest of conditions and keeps you beautifully floating. Unfortunately, I have not had the privilege to test them in light cold pillows, but in honesty's name ... how much of their time on skis do you spend in such snow? However, they do not doubt that they are fine too.
In summary, Scott has managed to fix a really good off-piste skiing with clearly approved piste skills.
Are you a skier who goes outside the hill in what relationship nature does offer, but you also want a bit of your ski in a piste under high like low fare, so I can recommend Scott Santiago Mission.
I'm 182 cm tall and went on a pair of 178-skis, which I found quite well. There is quite a lot of skiing so maybe nothing for the lightest riders, but a lot of skiing I think is a good deal for such a good all-round ski like this!
Seems it is difficult to give a general rating. Top score in the offpiste, and a very strong 3rd in the piste, so it probably ends with a very stable 4th, on the verge of 5th.
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 78 kg
I've tested them in everything from ice pistons, through 40cm untouched, slightly heavy snow, through the puck to the really heavy 30cm slash, which has given me a good feel for the ski.
Starting with general characteristics then. A properly wide ski, but as Scott still pushes down to a radius of about 15 m, this, along with being relatively stable and rigid, such as Scratch BC, gives it really good piste performance. Of course, it's nothing special to come up with when you hit ice, even in really hard surfaces, so you have to fight and edge properly to get hold of it, but in the remaining piste conditions it's very good. There is no skiing as you enter the very shortest turns, (in the pist will say), but that's not why you buy a ski like this. Of course, you can drive short-range, but then you have to work a bit and they do not offer that clip you get from a slalom ski right now.
In some larger turns, however, they invite them to speed and confidence. They are really stable while being so soft that they swallow irregularities smoothly and smoothly. Have before they run on a very hard and stable Atomic ski and I thought I would feel unsure of these at higher rates, but not.
Offpist and puckel then.
It may be a bit scary to be optimal for humpback, but it is still okay when it is compassionate and forgiving in uneven ground. Personally, I'm not a professional at the puck, but I have done a lot and it did not make it any more difficult for me immediately.
So offpiste.
In all circumstances with opistated surfaces, except for hard ice, you will get a ski that you will love, and that will love you back. Because this is where it wants to be! And it's fine even here you planned to keep up if you're thinking about these skis?
Scott Santiago is a nice, yet a very rewarding ski in the offpiste. It comes in very well even in the heaviest of conditions and keeps you beautifully floating. Unfortunately, I have not had the privilege to test them in light cold pillows, but in honesty's name ... how much of their time on skis do you spend in such snow? However, they do not doubt that they are fine too.
In summary, Scott has managed to fix a really good off-piste skiing with clearly approved piste skills.
Are you a skier who goes outside the hill in what relationship nature does offer, but you also want a bit of your ski in a piste under high like low fare, so I can recommend Scott Santiago Mission.
I'm 182 cm tall and went on a pair of 178-skis, which I found quite well. There is quite a lot of skiing so maybe nothing for the lightest riders, but a lot of skiing I think is a good deal for such a good all-round ski like this!
Seems it is difficult to give a general rating. Top score in the offpiste, and a very strong 3rd in the piste, so it probably ends with a very stable 4th, on the verge of 5th.
Model year: 2005
Riders weight: 78 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original