Scott Santiago

Scott Santiago
Brand: Scott
Model year: 2003

What do you think about Scott Santiago?
5
4
3
2
1
3.9
9 reviews
Lundstrom
28/10/2004
An all-round off-piste skiing that's fun with everywhere on the mountain. I drove 195 cm in length. The ski is quite fast-paced but still nods when needed. The only drawback was that I pulled the tie out of the skid without much power. There was no way to advertise the ski at Scott Svenska. Bad I think. Date of brand change?

Riders weight: 85 kg

Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Rombo
13/04/2003
I drive on a pair of 195 cm long Santiago. Additionally, I should have laid a plate between skid and tie. What I have noticed is that it gets rapper out of the turns and it has a slight dampening effect. If I'm going to stand a bit more in the offpiste, I'd rather choose a wide head monster.

+ Floats well outside the piste because of the rather big dimensions.
+ Also works fine in the piste.
+ Pretty easy.
+ Twintip, allows you to play a little in the park if you feel like it.
-The most durable plastic that lies on top of the skid loosens easily.
Can not tarnish too much.

Model year: 2002
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Klein
03/03/2003
Tried 185 on Freeride2002 and quickly thought about Scotts new moves: Swallows a lot but weighs a little. The twintips also help them make the cutters a little more fun than my old scots. Doubtful, however, is what happens at higher speeds, perhaps a bit of warning. Menmen, finfin in the funpark, fun but stable in the piste and certainly excellent in forest puddles! In summary, an affordable ski of the NEW cut.

Model year: 2002
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Lillje
28/01/2003
I've tested the 185 variant, and as a ski slope it works well, the swing radius feels short and it makes the ski experience as rap and mercury (compared to other mid-fats). The grip on a bit harder is quite alright, too, but the skid is a bit slippery at higher speeds and when there is a lot of roughness on the slope. I have not tested the ski in the offpist but probably it's the best work out ...

Model year: 2002
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
Dustbin_Dan
16/12/2002
Have tested it in a pist of length 195. Thought that in that context it was a bit too flattery in speed. Had also needed a plate for easier edging. Relatively negative rating due to external circumstances. Fits better in fluff and slash, but is rated as allround skiing.

Model year: 2002
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
mini1
15/10/2002
The long variants are very stable skis that really work all kinds of skiing. The best Scott ever has I would dare to claim.

Model year: 2001
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
MADZ
08/10/2002
Scott has done a full-right ski run.
Certainly one of the best all-round skiing in the market. Works for everything.

Model year: 2002
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
spOnkan
01/10/2002
I tried it on Freeride2002 and thought it was a terribly good ski. Maybe not as fetting as they promote it, but as a bit of all-purpose skiing, it's very well-approved. Weighs nothing and is therefore very suitable for jumping. Funny and ragged oars and very nice design. The only negative was that they can not be driven quickly without flutter.

Model year: 2002
Translated by Google  ・  Show original
JWester
29/09/2002
The hottest ski that has been made! I tested the green (165 cm), and it's so amazing ...
 + twintip
 + design
 + weighs nothing
 + stable

 - may feel a bit dumb sometimes

otherwise a top ski!

Model year: 2002
Translated by Google  ・  Show original