Völkl Vertigo G41 Pro
What do you think about Völkl Vertigo G41 Pro?
5
4
3
2
1
Have just died a couple of vertigo g41 over a few seasons now and I'm really sorry ... have fun for a wonderful ski .. you can run like hell in all kinds of terrain. And for a wonderful design (hahaha), they look very damn out ... but that's part of the charm (charm?) or? yes, awesome skiing at least ...
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Ruskigt stable ski ,,, clockwise ice grip. May be short-lived, though, you have to work a little ,,, went to Salomon Xscream 9 last year, then became the most short-lived ,, with the G-41: it's just getting puffed longwind ,, oh go fast I want to promise ,,, , a ski shop I definitely do not regret ,, best of all is that it can be found used for a couple of thousand flaps
Model year: 2000
Model year: 2000
Translated by Google ・ Show original
I'm only happy to say about it, drove about 1 day last year in Cham, and as everyone knows, it was up to date.
I had to compare with my then newly purchased x-scream series that stuck in every little pile, in short. The G41s were awesome, they tense they look at them then they tell them-Go to the elevator! that's just how to keep up with it!
This year, I've been lucky enough to buy a couple of kinds to be used in Chamo for three weeks in March and J **** R!
Model year: 1999
I had to compare with my then newly purchased x-scream series that stuck in every little pile, in short. The G41s were awesome, they tense they look at them then they tell them-Go to the elevator! that's just how to keep up with it!
This year, I've been lucky enough to buy a couple of kinds to be used in Chamo for three weeks in March and J **** R!
Model year: 1999
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Everything seems to be great. Have traveled with them all day on big mountains.
Simply a very good ski. On everything.
One I heard is that there were quality problems with them. But it can also be a shadow.
/ T Style
Model year: 1999
Simply a very good ski. On everything.
One I heard is that there were quality problems with them. But it can also be a shadow.
/ T Style
Model year: 1999
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Incredibly cruel skiing, among the most vigilant I went on. Funny in the piste, flowing amazingly in the offpiste. Heard by someone that the quality was a bit hesitant. But I love them
Model year: 2000
Model year: 2000
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Decided to change my skis after having been skiing for 11 years. First I bought a pair of atomic 10.26 beta races, which is a completely under-shoal if you like to go fast and I do! But after torturing it for over 100 days of skiing, it was time to change. And the only thing I was sure was that there would be a couple of walks .. and every pair of G41 and, as I see it, you could not choose a better ski!
Pist: Works excellent in all slopes, a bit hard in the puck on the shore but works out marked on ice as it is often in the Swedish slopes! Tung worked from edge to edge, but with a little will and practice it works!
Park: Works great for medium size jibbers ... Can land fakie with .... stable in the air and landing!
possibly a little heavy for more difficult rotation tricks!
Offpist: Excellent more, you do not have to say! With a little workout and weight of a bodyweight you can smell a powder, which is a nice feeling, so far, I've just left the snowboard.
Ps / next year's G4 as it's called then is even more cruel! / Ds
Model year: 2000
Pist: Works excellent in all slopes, a bit hard in the puck on the shore but works out marked on ice as it is often in the Swedish slopes! Tung worked from edge to edge, but with a little will and practice it works!
Park: Works great for medium size jibbers ... Can land fakie with .... stable in the air and landing!
possibly a little heavy for more difficult rotation tricks!
Offpist: Excellent more, you do not have to say! With a little workout and weight of a bodyweight you can smell a powder, which is a nice feeling, so far, I've just left the snowboard.
Ps / next year's G4 as it's called then is even more cruel! / Ds
Model year: 2000
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Well, then you've tested some fat skis in Jackson Hole. Ridged Völkl G41 198 cm, Salomon AK Rocket 200 cm and Rossi XXX 193 cm. As for Völkl G41, they never ceased to be surprised. Tested in loose cushions, powdered cushions, heavy snow, wet snow (there were actually more pluses an afternoon), prepared pist, hump and ice. Result ...... They go smoothly well EVERYTHING except in the odd puckle.
By comparison, Bandit XXX was simply worse at ALL. Yet they were very good. The G41s beat everything I had previously traveled and also the AK Rocket except in the most bottomless pillows. The wide tips make the ski lifts perfectly in pillows and they surf amazingly. Then drive into the piste and beat the racing guys in a grand slope. I promise, they go steady and keep the track at high speed.
For an old portraiser, you have to change the style but move out with both legs, so the card turns are as if on any racecarve ski.
The only downside is the little twintip that makes you insane in the hump if you cross the back ends.
Forget about snack on short skis when it comes to fatty foods. 198 cm G41 is extremely lightweight and shorter is not required. Drop into a steep corridor and you can still swing how fast you want.
The design one likes to say and so on, but I have ski to go on and this is the absolute best I've driven for all the rides except the ice-cream and puckle.
You may not compare skis directly to each other on this side, but because I drove the skis that way, it will be possible. Thus ..... Völkl G41 is better than Rossi XXX on everything. Salomon Ak Rocket is a softer ski than G41 and thus different. In completely bottomless pads, it is better at low speed, but at higher surf speed, the G41 will catch up. Otherwise ..... drive the G41
No, I do not work at Völkl but just like a good ski. Go and buy.
Model year: 2001
By comparison, Bandit XXX was simply worse at ALL. Yet they were very good. The G41s beat everything I had previously traveled and also the AK Rocket except in the most bottomless pillows. The wide tips make the ski lifts perfectly in pillows and they surf amazingly. Then drive into the piste and beat the racing guys in a grand slope. I promise, they go steady and keep the track at high speed.
For an old portraiser, you have to change the style but move out with both legs, so the card turns are as if on any racecarve ski.
The only downside is the little twintip that makes you insane in the hump if you cross the back ends.
Forget about snack on short skis when it comes to fatty foods. 198 cm G41 is extremely lightweight and shorter is not required. Drop into a steep corridor and you can still swing how fast you want.
The design one likes to say and so on, but I have ski to go on and this is the absolute best I've driven for all the rides except the ice-cream and puckle.
You may not compare skis directly to each other on this side, but because I drove the skis that way, it will be possible. Thus ..... Völkl G41 is better than Rossi XXX on everything. Salomon Ak Rocket is a softer ski than G41 and thus different. In completely bottomless pads, it is better at low speed, but at higher surf speed, the G41 will catch up. Otherwise ..... drive the G41
No, I do not work at Völkl but just like a good ski. Go and buy.
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Völkl G41, 198cm, telemark:
Since the day after I got the G41s, I was going to Norway for a turn, I dropped on telis bindings, as it is called "beat the Norwegians in their own game". I will return with a review when I drove the alpine on the skis.
Unfortunately, I have not tried the skis offpist. However, there is no reason to suspect they would not work well there. Reasonably, they become considerably lighter the smoother it becomes. Where I drove it was stuck, pissed underlay, but not quite hard. In the afternoons it was a bit softer, but without hesitation to sloppy. In this case, the G41 works very well. In fact, they feel EXACT that you can suspect before trying. Because of the width, the slow edge to edge. As soon as the ski is in the cutters, they are extremely good. Feeling in a cut on the semi-soft surface is a reminder of how a real racing ski feels when it's hard. The bigger the turns and the higher the speed, the better it goes. In fact, the skis feel more stable in super-G similar turns than my 203 centimeter grand slalom with real racing plates. Of course this depends on the width and if it were to be a racing base, G41 would not have a sigh.
It is possible to push a little shorter cut too, but then you have to be extremely active to get the skirt on edge fast and then take in really to push through the skid. In the wings of different radii in the piste the ski goes smoothly. The width is definitely reminded and it is important to get stuck firmly in the pants. The skid maintains good stability at high speed even on the cord. Short cord turns (ie classic short-range) also works if you take a little.
However, you can hardly buy such a ski if you intend to go around and wrap. The ski should clearly be clean. Technically, it works best with an aggressive input in the turn of the outer skid. Then you should put a lot of pressure on the inside, angle a little in the hip and lean a lot inwards in the turn. The more you get the skid on, the better it goes. If you want to pinch the cutting edge slightly towards the end of the turn, you can tilt slightly to counter the extra power needed.
The final conclusion is that this ski is a perfect complement to a real magnificent snowmobile skiing for days when there is hard snow or ice on the menu. If you like to take in properly to get rewarded with clean cut and high speed, G41 may make me feel better than G41 when it's soft.
I've driven 198cm. For old and sick, women and children, 178 and 188cm are also available. When choosing length, do not forget that the G41 has a little twintip and a longer tip than many narrower skis. The area of 198: the ore is about 172, which is around six cm shorter is a Völkl two-meter grand slalom and only about four cm longer than an 188 grand slalom.
HWC HitMe
Model year: 2001
Since the day after I got the G41s, I was going to Norway for a turn, I dropped on telis bindings, as it is called "beat the Norwegians in their own game". I will return with a review when I drove the alpine on the skis.
Unfortunately, I have not tried the skis offpist. However, there is no reason to suspect they would not work well there. Reasonably, they become considerably lighter the smoother it becomes. Where I drove it was stuck, pissed underlay, but not quite hard. In the afternoons it was a bit softer, but without hesitation to sloppy. In this case, the G41 works very well. In fact, they feel EXACT that you can suspect before trying. Because of the width, the slow edge to edge. As soon as the ski is in the cutters, they are extremely good. Feeling in a cut on the semi-soft surface is a reminder of how a real racing ski feels when it's hard. The bigger the turns and the higher the speed, the better it goes. In fact, the skis feel more stable in super-G similar turns than my 203 centimeter grand slalom with real racing plates. Of course this depends on the width and if it were to be a racing base, G41 would not have a sigh.
It is possible to push a little shorter cut too, but then you have to be extremely active to get the skirt on edge fast and then take in really to push through the skid. In the wings of different radii in the piste the ski goes smoothly. The width is definitely reminded and it is important to get stuck firmly in the pants. The skid maintains good stability at high speed even on the cord. Short cord turns (ie classic short-range) also works if you take a little.
However, you can hardly buy such a ski if you intend to go around and wrap. The ski should clearly be clean. Technically, it works best with an aggressive input in the turn of the outer skid. Then you should put a lot of pressure on the inside, angle a little in the hip and lean a lot inwards in the turn. The more you get the skid on, the better it goes. If you want to pinch the cutting edge slightly towards the end of the turn, you can tilt slightly to counter the extra power needed.
The final conclusion is that this ski is a perfect complement to a real magnificent snowmobile skiing for days when there is hard snow or ice on the menu. If you like to take in properly to get rewarded with clean cut and high speed, G41 may make me feel better than G41 when it's soft.
I've driven 198cm. For old and sick, women and children, 178 and 188cm are also available. When choosing length, do not forget that the G41 has a little twintip and a longer tip than many narrower skis. The area of 198: the ore is about 172, which is around six cm shorter is a Völkl two-meter grand slalom and only about four cm longer than an 188 grand slalom.
HWC HitMe
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Best of the best !!
This skiing works over everything as fast as you go. Skidornas KUNG. There is not a ski in this category that can show off the same icebreaker in the piste, check and follow-up outside the piste. It has everything but possibly the design.
Buy it!!!!
Model year: 2001
This skiing works over everything as fast as you go. Skidornas KUNG. There is not a ski in this category that can show off the same icebreaker in the piste, check and follow-up outside the piste. It has everything but possibly the design.
Buy it!!!!
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Great skiing! It can run anytime with it in virtually all snow. Good with such wide skis that are so stiff compared to most other fetches such as AK launcher, which sucks. It goes like rails in the piste and is very fast-paced and it's good ice-creams forever. The downside is that it does not work well in short-range and is quite heavy. When I bought them they say they were like the G40: the guys !! ??
Model year: 2001
Model year: 2001
Translated by Google ・ Show original