Burton C16
Model year: 2004
What do you think about Burton C16?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
sleek look of the bindings and the massive 2 component buckles as well as the light weight - they are even lighter than the newer C60s - are the strengths of the bindings
Weaknesses:
a weakness a definitely the qualitiy of a premium segment listed bindings: the paint tends to chrack and chips off - my highback even broke after the first week of regular riding
the so called italian leather of the srtaps perishes very soon
Summary:
lightweight very direct bindings at an unjustified price compared to quality
sleek look of the bindings and the massive 2 component buckles as well as the light weight - they are even lighter than the newer C60s - are the strengths of the bindings
Weaknesses:
a weakness a definitely the qualitiy of a premium segment listed bindings: the paint tends to chrack and chips off - my highback even broke after the first week of regular riding
the so called italian leather of the srtaps perishes very soon
Summary:
lightweight very direct bindings at an unjustified price compared to quality
Strengths:
hard as steel ... or Mexican carbon. Do not care for hacks. as the drill writes; setting options as well as the genealogical function. ease and a good looking design. Love.
Weaknesses:
No objection to this puknket but became lacquer when I managed to crack the backing. sadness.
Summary:
get it and ride ...
hard as steel ... or Mexican carbon. Do not care for hacks. as the drill writes; setting options as well as the genealogical function. ease and a good looking design. Love.
Weaknesses:
No objection to this puknket but became lacquer when I managed to crack the backing. sadness.
Summary:
get it and ride ...
Translated by Google ・ Show original
did not like that at all, Bakkapan was good, just too straight and stiff = (
Translated by Google ・ Show original