Barryvox Pulse
Brand: BarryvoxModel year: 2007
What do you think about Barryvox Pulse?
5
4
3
2
1
Strengths:
A very good product. Very user-friendly also for those who have never used it before, but there are additional features that you can use if you want.
The scope is a plus.
Being comfortable wearing is hardly known because it is so smooth and easy.
Are many stores in Sweden that have begun to lower the price of the pulse until this year.
Weaknesses:
That it low-priority "non-pulses" when searching.
Battery time when searching is so low.
Summary:
Hitech transiver that works very well.
A very good product. Very user-friendly also for those who have never used it before, but there are additional features that you can use if you want.
The scope is a plus.
Being comfortable wearing is hardly known because it is so smooth and easy.
Are many stores in Sweden that have begun to lower the price of the pulse until this year.
Weaknesses:
That it low-priority "non-pulses" when searching.
Battery time when searching is so low.
Summary:
Hitech transiver that works very well.
Translated by Google ・ Show original

Strengths:
Have just been out and tried Pulse now. Can only agree with CB that it is a good product. Took me 2 min to find 3 buried at the test center down here. And the range is superior to my old F1.
Weaknesses:
Animals in Sweden ...
Summary:
Seems this was easier to use than new S1. Certainly a good product. Will be interesting to test the pulse function at the time.
Have just been out and tried Pulse now. Can only agree with CB that it is a good product. Took me 2 min to find 3 buried at the test center down here. And the range is superior to my old F1.
Weaknesses:
Animals in Sweden ...
Summary:
Seems this was easier to use than new S1. Certainly a good product. Will be interesting to test the pulse function at the time.
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Strengths:
A very user-friendly transceiver. I let an almost inexperienced person try the Pulse without any instruction. He found the first buried in just over 1 minute. With a few words of intruction he managed to find 2 buried in 1 minute and 36 seconds!
It has a built-in compass that allows you to follow the signal 360 degrees around, not just with a few diodes at the front.
The Transcevier has a very good multi-function feature where you can choose to lock individual buried and mark / shield those found but not dug up.
The range is also good for being a digital transceiver, I tested against the older Barryn and the Pulse locked the signal 10m before I even heard it analogue to the other. It took another 10m before the elderly could lock. A total of 38 m from a transmitter buried 50 cm below the snow surface.
Weaknesses:
The pulse function. Not that it does not work, but I'm skeptical of the fact that all other transceiver brands will be marked as low-priority items. Before transceiver manufacturers agree that this should be a standard, you can discuss the moral of using that feature.
Battery use. It seems to pull very much battery in search mode.
Expensive.
Summary:
A new transceiver, it is clearly better than any other transceiver on the market. If Ortovox S1 will not match it, there are no other options.
A very user-friendly transceiver. I let an almost inexperienced person try the Pulse without any instruction. He found the first buried in just over 1 minute. With a few words of intruction he managed to find 2 buried in 1 minute and 36 seconds!
It has a built-in compass that allows you to follow the signal 360 degrees around, not just with a few diodes at the front.
The Transcevier has a very good multi-function feature where you can choose to lock individual buried and mark / shield those found but not dug up.
The range is also good for being a digital transceiver, I tested against the older Barryn and the Pulse locked the signal 10m before I even heard it analogue to the other. It took another 10m before the elderly could lock. A total of 38 m from a transmitter buried 50 cm below the snow surface.
Weaknesses:
The pulse function. Not that it does not work, but I'm skeptical of the fact that all other transceiver brands will be marked as low-priority items. Before transceiver manufacturers agree that this should be a standard, you can discuss the moral of using that feature.
Battery use. It seems to pull very much battery in search mode.
Expensive.
Summary:
A new transceiver, it is clearly better than any other transceiver on the market. If Ortovox S1 will not match it, there are no other options.
Translated by Google ・ Show original
