Salomon Pocket Rocket (Page 4)

Awesome good skiing. Can do everything with and work in all environments and weather conditions ...

MVH -Robban-

Model year: 2003

A bit fluttery in high fires on hard surfaces.
Otherwise, a bell ski for LIGHT WEIGHT, works in all modes, very playful. I feel comfortable. Is tired of hearing all the rumors that it's impossible to go on! Everybody is different, a ski can not suit everyone.

Model year: 2003

I tested the 165 because I'm only 170 tall o weighs only 55 kilos, and I perceived it as superbly ...
Running the back with it, worked excellent, stable, floating on the snow, did not flutter at high speed, then I drove off the streak, even there stable, cruel ice grip, and soft feeling in the elevator queue when everyone snapped on the "cool skis that the guy has." ... But they are no pure jibblag, even if they appear to be feasible fakie in punched pillows .... If you have a lot of air, and it blows a bit, it almost feels like being caught by the air .... thus operating. But the rides: WOW !!

Model year: 2002

A ski that goes perfectly to go all over the mountain. Jump, dance does what you want, but what you do, do not stand still. One must use such a ski run. Want to go more on it than I have done now.

Model year: 2003

Agrees that the skis feel fluttery at high speed, but they have not been made to go downhill. The same can be said of all the slopes with little turning radius. In deep cuts, however, they go as good as possible. I weigh 95kg muscles and have no trouble chewing the skis. The skis feel like sticking to the ground and I have never experienced any tendency to let go of the grip. The special thing about them is the incredible ride feeling, very lively and playful and not as boring as my G41or sometimes feels. Intent on Völkl they are cruel in their own way (full speed in all bowls), but because of their rigid and subdued construction, one loses a little playfulness. Pocket: Arna is also doing well in smaller systems especially in tight forest skiing, where one can not find a better companion. They are simply a good complement to a couple of true locomotives such as Asteroid, V-Eplosive, etc., which are better suited for large mountains with open spaces at high speed. Do you feel that you do not travel a lot in Alaska and the great mountains in the Alps, so I can deeply welcome P-R.
Mr. Powder.

Model year: 2002

I have only tried 175cm and it is enough where the fault is located, the ski was felt a little bit soft and worried. In addition, the slope radius was "too short" for the skis, I do not really know how to explain better. There was no further bet in the turn iaf (in piste, could not try them anywhere else).

Assuming that the 185s feel better, but I have not run it yet ...

Model year: 2002

Can only say one thing, how fun! I'm 183 cm and weigh 75. Ridden 175 cm with chili binding. Works top everywhere, especially in the sneeze! Can be a bit fluttery in hard / ice piste, but what, you can not get everything! After that, it was not bad, 300 euros in Val d'Isère! Clearly worth the money !!!

Model year: 2002

Well, not my piece of cake just. Is probably a bit too heavy with my 85 boilers. Feels flattering and soft. However, can understand that there are people that fit.

Model year: 2002

Great skiing, however, requires 1-2 days to change the ride.
Most overrated, I am aware of how well the skis work in lack of crowds, and carton snow. Usually, you usually get stuck with the back end if you're probably able to keep the tips above the crowd, but with PR it works great, probably because of the twintip design. Very good even in pillows.

Model year: 2002

As Dr Alban should say, Stable. drove it a few days in Sölden. what should you say about this skiing?

Model year: 2002