Stöckli Stormrider XL (Page 2)

there are no skis that are better for big turns on big mountains at full speed, just burning on ...

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 85 kg

Fantastic skiing. Got a little scared when I first went on it when it cut in all positions = it refuses to be worn. And it goes rough and fast. The only reason it does not get a five is because I fail to make it work perfectly in the offpiste. A little too hard for my taste. But in the piste - rude good. I'm 183cm tall, weighs 74kg. Driving slalom on 174cm Stökli Stormrider XL.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 74 kg

say what you want but here we have No. 1 among the skis. Going for yourself, oh, have not found anything better. stable, lively yes list can be done long over good qualities but d gets harder to find some worse, unfortunately :)
you have to test it to understand how well it e ...

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 95 kg

Perfect skiing for Swedish conditions. Stable and easy-going.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 78 kg

Stöckli!
Have also tested the ski for 1 week in Italy
yesterday, must say that you are disappointed.
The skis, who only received such good criticism everywhere
did the ipist feel a lot! mute.
Offpist, ok, we were very loose.
Additionally, I can drive both Völkl
supersport 6 and salomon hot this winter
Both of these skis provide much more response,
but Völkl is outstanding.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 100 kg

Baby do not be so cruel.
it's a wonderful ski. Yes ... some flaws. Not as good as bumpy storms but still a good skiing. Okay, they had shortcomings o a little disappointed I became anyway

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 77 kg

Must agree totally with the previous. Certainly a cruel skiing that works for the most part. How to experience this ski as boring in a pistil and cuddled in pillows, I just can not understand and therefore have to discard this with lack of technology. Run yourself on this year's Stormrider DP, which I think is a great skiing, but if you are going to ride a lot in our Swedish mountain, which does not provide so much of our dear fluff, I find it hard to find a better ski than Stormrider XL in today's range. Cruel!!

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 80 kg

An absolutely outstanding ski!
Do not know how people above can describe the ski in this way. Maybe a week a year, and the technology is completely broken! Was a bit upset when I read previous review! Then when did it come 2.5m in cervinia in a week and free to go to sleep?
An absolute must have!
For those of you who think it's a bit expensive, you can tell me how to get it for approx. half price against this home. However, I do not want to get used to Swedish skiing but sometimes it's just too expensive to be true!
Probably will drive jerk in the future until someone proves the opposite. Promises that it will be difficult!

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 80 kg

drove on storms 1 week in cervinia, it came 2.5 snow in 6 days.
I was very disappointed with the response in the piste, it was like going on a couple of 2.1 grand slalom from the 80's, to get back at all when pushing in the turn, you had to be in high speed.
In pillows it was okay.
But overall I think it's boring to drive too much feeling to ride on rails.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 85 kg

Run on Stormrider XL 184 cm in a snowy Andermatt. Do not disagree with the ski in the mischkön. In snowy snow, the skis brought their own little life.
If it was completely untouched, it seemed like it was done. However, in a pist it was very easy to drive. Like on rails. The rating is based on the testimonials: 40 cm cushions.

Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 90 kg