Völkl Gotama (Page 7)
A good ski that fits fine in the piste, best in high lanes combined with big turns, no overcrowding maybe ...
in a sneeze they gave me just what I wanted to have no complaints at all on the offpiste properties!
bought them in January & then went on for them all season out. The ones are worn on the top but who cares?
Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 110 kg
in a sneeze they gave me just what I wanted to have no complaints at all on the offpiste properties!
bought them in January & then went on for them all season out. The ones are worn on the top but who cares?
Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 110 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Widespread skiing for pads, however, works in a dull piste but a bit soft when it starts to get tight.
Next year they are reinforced with metal.
Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 78 kg
Next year they are reinforced with metal.
Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 78 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
They tested for the first time now on Friday 28th of November in the tandadal.
Everyone can probably agree that there is no doubt that there is only pistol skiing that applies there and then. How they are in the offpist will come later.
They are not too excited about the piste, especially if there is flatlus and a lot of people.
They have the skies wake up to the first when it starts to go a little faster, but then the fiction is pretty good. They may not be as stable as the explosives, but still feel relatively safe at high speeds of ice and hard-packed.
To be a tough ski that is made to go on the "back" mountain, it works well in a hard pist if you find open, crowded areas and steep surfaces. As you said, you have to stand a little bit for the ski to give something back.
In short distances on hard surfaces and in an overgrown piste, they are not optimal, but you might have figured out from the beginning.
I was a bit worried before I had the chance to try them to be fluttery at high levels. In fact, they are very soft, especially when compared to the explosives that I had before. However, as I wrote above, they are safest in high traffic even though the explosives are snap better, even when it comes to pistoling.
Assuming that the ski is not designed for piste, it has to be run there sometimes, and if you find people and steep slopes, they are really fun given the conditions.
Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 75 kg
Everyone can probably agree that there is no doubt that there is only pistol skiing that applies there and then. How they are in the offpist will come later.
They are not too excited about the piste, especially if there is flatlus and a lot of people.
They have the skies wake up to the first when it starts to go a little faster, but then the fiction is pretty good. They may not be as stable as the explosives, but still feel relatively safe at high speeds of ice and hard-packed.
To be a tough ski that is made to go on the "back" mountain, it works well in a hard pist if you find open, crowded areas and steep surfaces. As you said, you have to stand a little bit for the ski to give something back.
In short distances on hard surfaces and in an overgrown piste, they are not optimal, but you might have figured out from the beginning.
I was a bit worried before I had the chance to try them to be fluttery at high levels. In fact, they are very soft, especially when compared to the explosives that I had before. However, as I wrote above, they are safest in high traffic even though the explosives are snap better, even when it comes to pistoling.
Assuming that the ski is not designed for piste, it has to be run there sometimes, and if you find people and steep slopes, they are really fun given the conditions.
Model year: 2004
Riders weight: 75 kg
Translated by Google ・ Show original
CRUEL!
By all means, oh show !!!
There are 2 negative things only!
do not know what you look like on the page where you see the wood core, but mine is unlatched there when it came straight from the factory, and then you get a lot of snow where o freezes to ... not good at all!
Then the ski center is in the wrong place, you have not thought that skiing goes up so much in the tail ... but it's okay to arrange yourself fine!
Model year: 2004
By all means, oh show !!!
There are 2 negative things only!
do not know what you look like on the page where you see the wood core, but mine is unlatched there when it came straight from the factory, and then you get a lot of snow where o freezes to ... not good at all!
Then the ski center is in the wrong place, you have not thought that skiing goes up so much in the tail ... but it's okay to arrange yourself fine!
Model year: 2004
Translated by Google ・ Show original
I thought you could get a good cut with skis over 100mm in the waist of the piste but I was wrong. Flies really well in the snow and has no trouble with the speed just to pull on.
Big plus on the design and the lovely sprayer
Model year: 2004
Big plus on the design and the lovely sprayer
Model year: 2004
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Gummiski !! It is said that the Pocket Rocket is soft, but these were much softer. It's a fat pudderski so it was good in the off-piste, but mostly hopeless in the piste.
Model year: 2004
Model year: 2004
Translated by Google ・ Show original
good wide ski from the wind!
German quality straight through.
as the best offpiste, good at all, but unusually good even in the piste to be a skirt with over 100 mm waist! But then it's a good idea!
F o plus also for the design that makes it the coolest ski I've seen!
Model year: 2004
German quality straight through.
as the best offpiste, good at all, but unusually good even in the piste to be a skirt with over 100 mm waist! But then it's a good idea!
F o plus also for the design that makes it the coolest ski I've seen!
Model year: 2004
Translated by Google ・ Show original